news Canadian News
Good Evening Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Quebec to get $10B of $18B in federal equalizat

Canadian Content
20692news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Quebec to get $10B of $18B in federal equalization payments | CTV Montreal News


Political | 206915 hits | Aug 18 4:02 pm | Posted by: Freakinoldguy
25 Comment

Federal Finance Minister Bill Morneau released fresh figures Sunday outlining how much the neediest provinces can expect to receive from Ottawa in the next fiscal year – and Quebec will receive a large chunk of the money.

Comments

  1. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Thu Aug 18, 2016 11:04 pm
    In the immortal words of one Gomer Pyle.




    Surprise, Surprise. :roll:

  2. by peck420
    Thu Aug 18, 2016 11:08 pm
    I fucked up.

    I started reading the comments. R=EM

  3. by Thanos
    Thu Aug 18, 2016 11:30 pm







  4. by avatar llama66
    Thu Aug 18, 2016 11:55 pm
    Newsflash!

  5. by avatar martin14
    Fri Aug 19, 2016 5:43 am
    "llama66" said
    Newsflash!


    Well, Justine did say he was a Quebecker first and Canadian second.
    Guess he wasn't lying.

  6. by avatar PJB
    Fri Aug 19, 2016 3:03 pm
    Not overly surprised. Quebec needs all that federal money to suppress anything 'Anglo' and maintain their unique standing within Canada. Personally, I wish they would just separate and get it over with. Western Canada hates Quebec and I really don't think Ontario is all that fond of the frogs either.

  7. by avatar bootlegga
    Fri Aug 19, 2016 3:17 pm
    While I don't care for this one bit, the news story is from December 21, 2015...next time you might want to post this in the Rants/Raves section instead of news.

    #JustSaying :wink:

  8. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Fri Aug 19, 2016 6:00 pm
    "bootlegga" said
    While I don't care for this one bit, the news story is from December 21, 2015...next time you might want to post this in the Rants/Raves section instead of news.

    #JustSaying :wink:


    Unfortunately that doesn't make it untrue or not news and whether you agree or not this is a case of finding out better late than never.

    But, what I found even more disturbing was the fact that he Liberals had been in power just over 2 months when they decided to give the kingdom's riches to Quebec.

    I guess it's just payment for them choosing the anointed one over Tom Mulcair and just goes to show anyone can be bought even a province.

  9. by avatar ShepherdsDog
    Fri Aug 19, 2016 6:46 pm

    Western Canada hates Quebec and I really don't think Ontario is all that fond of the frogs either.


    I don't think that's quite correct. It's just Quebecois that aren't liked.

  10. by avatar bootlegga
    Wed Aug 24, 2016 3:43 am
    "Freakinoldguy" said
    While I don't care for this one bit, the news story is from December 21, 2015...next time you might want to post this in the Rants/Raves section instead of news.

    #JustSaying :wink:


    Unfortunately that doesn't make it untrue or not news and whether you agree or not this is a case of finding out better late than never.

    But, what I found even more disturbing was the fact that he Liberals had been in power just over 2 months when they decided to give the kingdom's riches to Quebec.

    I guess it's just payment for them choosing the anointed one over Tom Mulcair and just goes to show anyone can be bought even a province.


    My point was that this is no longer news, and so shouldn't be posted in the news section. :P

    And for the record, Trudeau wasn't in power for "just over two months" - he was in office for 6 weeks (Nov. 4 was when he and Cabinet were sworn in) - and most of that time (Nov 14 - Dec 16) was spent sitting in the House.

    http://www.parl.gc.ca/content/hoc/house ... ar2016.pdf

    Odds are, that decision was made well before the election was called and Trudeau had nothing to do with it.

    Having said that, I think he should have re-distributed it better, but equalization is a BS form of welfare that will never work in the have-province's favour.

  11. by avatar BeaverFever
    Wed Aug 24, 2016 3:58 am
    Equalization payments to Quebec is nothing new, I don't know how you can honestly carp about Trudeau "deciding to give away the kingdoms riches". Especially not 6 weeks into the governments term

  12. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Wed Aug 24, 2016 6:15 am
    "BeaverFever" said
    Equalization payments to Quebec is nothing new, I don't know how you can honestly carp about Trudeau "deciding to give away the kingdoms riches". Especially not 6 weeks into the governments term


    Unless you Liberal supporters can come up with proof that the conservatives were going to give the same amount to Quebec then my comments stands.

  13. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Wed Aug 24, 2016 6:23 am
    "bootlegga" said
    While I don't care for this one bit, the news story is from December 21, 2015...next time you might want to post this in the Rants/Raves section instead of news.

    #JustSaying :wink:


    Unfortunately that doesn't make it untrue or not news and whether you agree or not this is a case of finding out better late than never.

    But, what I found even more disturbing was the fact that he Liberals had been in power just over 2 months when they decided to give the kingdom's riches to Quebec.

    I guess it's just payment for them choosing the anointed one over Tom Mulcair and just goes to show anyone can be bought even a province.


    My point was that this is no longer news, and so shouldn't be posted in the news section. :P

    And for the record, Trudeau wasn't in power for "just over two months" - he was in office for 6 weeks (Nov. 4 was when he and Cabinet were sworn in) - and most of that time (Nov 14 - Dec 16) was spent sitting in the House.

    http://www.parl.gc.ca/content/hoc/house ... ar2016.pdf

    Odds are, that decision was made well before the election was called and Trudeau had nothing to do with it.

    Having said that, I think he should have re-distributed it better, but equalization is a BS form of welfare that will never work in the have-province's favour.


    I'm glad to know that news has an expiry date. It'll make my ignoring of anything untoward's the Conservatives have done before yesterday that much easier. :wink:

  14. by Canadian_Mind
    Wed Aug 24, 2016 12:42 pm
    I do believe the term "news" originated from people discussing "new things," "new events," "new happenings," etc. Eventually all the terms got abbreviated into one word, "news." If the news isn't new, it isn't news. It may be old though, so maybe we can make a new word for old events, happenings, and things, "olds," which this story would be.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net