![]() Wynne says supporting Trudeau was bid to improve federal-provincial relationsProvincial Politics | 207612 hits | Mar 30 8:36 pm | Posted by: shockedcanadian Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 2 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Who voted on this?
|
How so? The provincial liberals were at odds with Harper's government. Of course want a better relationship with the feds. Toronto transit improvements depend on it.
A more realistic statement.
How so? The provincial liberals were at odds with Harper's government. Of course Ontarians want a better relationship with the feds. Toronto transit improvements depend on it.
Are you really suggesting that Kathleen Wynne is a truthful politician?
Wynne was at odds with the Harper government over a variety of issues that have seemed to have faded since JT came to power. Particularly, equalization.
How can an issue be so divisive with Harper in office simply disappear when the Federal Liberals come to power?
She supported JT to support the Liberal brand/party. Nothing wrong with that. There's no need to BS us into telling us that it's all about good Federal/Provincial relations.
Are you really suggesting that Kathleen Wynne is a truthful politician?
As politicians go, sure. She said the gasplant cancellations were political. Name another politician who'd admit that? How much more honesty can you get from a politician?
Wynne was at odds with the Harper government over a variety of issues that have seemed to have faded since JT came to power. Particularly, equalization.
How can an issue be so divisive with Harper in office simply disappear when the Federal Liberals come to power?
I would presume that it disappeared in the hope that JT would be "kinder" to her than Harper was.
She supported JT to support the Liberal brand/party. Nothing wrong with that. There's no need to BS us into telling us that it's all about good Federal/Provincial relations.
Why can't it be both?
As politicians go, sure. She said the gasplant cancellations were political. Name another politician who'd admit that? How much more honesty can you get from a politician?
You set the bar quite low.
I don't consider someone truthful after telling the truth once.
Why can't it be both?
Because I don't buy into the suggestion that harmony between her government and the Fed's was such an important issue since she showed zero desire for such a relationship while Harper was in power.
How so? The provincial liberals were at odds with Harper's government. Of course want a better relationship with the feds. Toronto transit improvements depend on it.
A more realistic statement.
Are you suggesting that outside of Toronto, people don't want good federal/provincial relations??
How so? The provincial liberals were at odds with Harper's government. Of course want a better relationship with the feds. Toronto transit improvements depend on it.
A more realistic statement.
Are you suggesting that outside of Toronto, people don't want good federal/provincial relations??
How so? The provincial liberals were at odds with Harper's government. Of course Ontarians want a better relationship with the feds. Toronto transit improvements depend on it.
Are you really suggesting that Kathleen Wynne is a truthful politician?
Wynne was at odds with the Harper government over a variety of issues that have seemed to have faded since JT came to power. Particularly, equalization.
How can an issue be so divisive with Harper in office simply disappear when the Federal Liberals come to power?
She supported JT to support the Liberal brand/party. Nothing wrong with that. There's no need to BS us into telling us that it's all about good Federal/Provincial relations.
It's probably both for the moment, but you'll note that federal and Pronvincial politics aren't necessarily aligned and the federal and provincial branches of the parties aren't necessarily either.
A more truthful reading is that Wynne and JT currently have enough common ground - ideologically and politically - that they can play nice and feel they can mutually benefit from close association. That may not last, but for the time being it's convenient.
You set the bar quite low.
I don't consider someone truthful after telling the truth once.
Of course the bar is low. We're talking about politicians. The rest of your statement is hyperbole.
Because I don't buy into the suggestion that harmony between her government and the Fed's was such an important issue since she showed zero desire for such a relationship while Harper was in power.
Nor did Harper show any desire to play nice with her. Such is the nature of partisan politics. Any blame for whatever friction there was between Ottawa and Queen's Park is as much the federal Conservatives' fault as anyone's. Ask Conservative premiers what it was like dealing with Mackenzie King or Liberal premiers what it was like dealing with Mulroney. Like-minded people are always going to get along better. People on the same team are likely to get along better. Do you go for beers with the guys on the other team after your games?
This just smells like bitter conservatives looking for a controversy where none exists.
How so? The provincial liberals were at odds with Harper's government. Of course want a better relationship with the feds. Toronto transit improvements depend on it.
A more realistic statement.
Are you suggesting that outside of Toronto, people don't want good federal/provincial relations??
What I suggested is that people of Ontario are sick of tax dollars going to Toronto transit with everyone else getting nothing.
Do you go for beers with the guys on the other team after your games?
Yes, we do.
This just smells like bitter conservatives looking for a controversy where none exists.
Just as it smells like you coming in to defend Kathleen, once again.