Link Related to Canada in some say

Peace bond will limit activity of Aaron Driver, ISIS supporter


Law & Order | 206824 hits | Feb 03 8:32 am | Posted by: N_Fiddledog
10 Comment

Aaron Driver, who authorities fear might get involved in terrorist activity, says he had no choice but to agree to a peace bond, while his lawyer calls it a "fair compromise."

Comments

  1. by avatar martin14
    Wed Feb 03, 2016 6:49 pm
    Hi CBC, thanks for telling us where he lives.
    Next time, give us his phone number too.

    Privacy ?
    Nope, not round here.

  2. by avatar stratos
    Wed Feb 03, 2016 7:55 pm
    Not even sure what exactly he did to break the law in the first place.

  3. by avatar DrCaleb
    Wed Feb 03, 2016 7:57 pm
    "stratos" said
    Not even sure what exactly he did to break the law in the first place.


    He posted support for ISIS on social media.

  4. by avatar stratos
    Wed Feb 03, 2016 8:12 pm
    ummm okay. Not sure how that is breaking the law. Seems like limitation of freedom of speech.

  5. by avatar Delwin
    Wed Feb 03, 2016 8:30 pm
    He didn't break the law, he is being restricted under Bill C-51 which doesn't require you to break the law. It granted sweeping powers for authorities to restrict your freedoms preventively.

    Its main provisions would facilitate information sharing among 17 (and some say more than 17) federal institutions, give police powers that would allow them to preventatively detain or restrict terror suspects, ban the “promotion of terrorism,” allow the public safety minister to add people to Canada’s “no-fly list,” and enhance the powers of Canada’s spy agency CSIS.


    https://ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/canada- ... 50439.html

  6. by avatar uwish
    Wed Feb 03, 2016 10:45 pm
    it likely won't stand against a constitutional challenge.

  7. by avatar DrCaleb
    Thu Feb 04, 2016 2:10 pm
    "uwish" said
    it likely won't stand against a constitutional challenge.


    Harper knew it wouldn't when Parliament passed it. That way he could got on his high horse and claim that the courts are ruling Canada. The best part will be no one will be punished for the violation of people's rights. :(

    "stratos" said
    Seems like limitation of freedom of speech.


    Most countries accept that freedoms of some people can be limited when they violate the freedoms of others. Otherwise, we couldn't restrict one persons' freedom of movement and put them in jail for violating someone's freedom of security. ;)

  8. by avatar Public_Domain
    Thu Feb 04, 2016 4:29 pm
    :|

  9. by avatar Fireworks
    Mon Feb 08, 2016 11:25 pm
    "stratos" said
    Not even sure what exactly he did to break the law in the first place.



    Who said that he broke the law?

  10. by avatar DrCaleb
    Tue Feb 09, 2016 2:51 pm
    "Fireworks" said
    Not even sure what exactly he did to break the law in the first place.


    Who said that he broke the law?

    You don't get your freedom restricted by the courts because you forgot your chores this week.



view comments in forum
You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile