![]() Via Rail terror plotter wants to be tried by laws of Qur’anLaw & Order | 206770 hits | Jan 16 11:23 am | Posted by: N_Fiddledog Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 2 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
|
Do we get to behead him after the guilty verdict?
Why not?
Do we get to behead him after the guilty verdict?
Nope. But we don't follow the Quran for our laws. I suggest we offer him a one way ticket to Saudi Arabia, which does.
Why not?
Do we get to behead him after the guilty verdict?
Nope. But we don't follow the Quran for our laws. I suggest we offer him a one way ticket to Saudi Arabia, which does.
The goddam Saudis will welcome him as a hero.
The Saudis are not our friends.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/17263 ... greenfield
What if we let this guy out and he refuses to leave unless he gets cake?
He's been tried and convicted. His appeal to be tried under the Koran is just a lawyer make work project, in fact I can't understand a lawyer ethically taking it on.
Costs for appeals should be borne by those appealing, or by their lawyers.
That will reduce the amount of dumb bullshit like this;
which everyone has to pay for.
Good, since it's just typical rightie tightie bullshit. He's been tried and convicted. His appeal to be tried under the Koran is just a lawyer make work project, in fact I can't understand a lawyer ethically taking it on. It could be decided that the judge made an error in law, but that's very unlikely. But I know, lets get our knickers in a knot about nothing. Because Islam.
My knickers are not in a knot... Just saying it's a crock and it costs us all money.
If you want I will ask my kid if he knows where his copy of the flying spaghetti monster book is. I could look it up for you...
Maybe we also have to remember that this is a Sun article, and the Koran part is just a small part of the appeal, not the heart of it.
The sun of course leaves out a fact (shocker): although it mentions that his lawyers were court-appointed, anyone following the news story would recall that this guy initially represented himself, that he tried made the same defence about only being eligible to be tried by the quran, and that he failed.
The lawyers were court appointed during sentencing after his behaviour became more bizarre and he was deemed to likely suffer from schizophrenia, although still fit for trial.
This is a non-story.