 Law & Order: SVU fake sex allegations lead to teacher lawsuitLaw & Order | 206809 hits | Apr 11 8:25 pm | Posted by: andyt  A Nanaimo, B.C. teacher is suing an investigator who concluded he sexually abused a female student based on claims allegedly fabricated from episodes of Law & Order: Special Victims Unit.Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 2 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
But despite the "horrific" allegations, McEwan noted in her report the student was "never once attended an emergency clinic, hospital or walk-in clinic to treat her injuries."
"Nor did her attentive parents notice a thing — not the torn clothing, the burns; neither the bleeding to the extent that blood dripped into the swimming pool, nor her midnight foray. Not the filth from being buried or being soaked wet from waterboarding. Nothing. How likely is it that she could suffer the indignities she says she did and then go home for dinner and homework?"
What really makes this shit ridiculous is this:
But last July, McEwen upheld a grievance by his union, ordering the school district to "make whole." The final outcome of that matter hasn't yet been decided.
It's a scary route to take. Not only for those who are unfortunate enough to be falsely accused, but for all of us. How long till that kind of thinking is extended to other crimes? How far down that route are we already when it comes to security and terrorism issues?
No doubt the justice system deals badly with sexual violence, but upending centuries of legal principles is not the answer.
So your argument is that women lie! I say fine, bitches be crazy! What is your next course of action after that? You want them punished, and I say fine! What next? Why is that your only demand? Do you see why this saddens me, when this is your one contribution? No clamoring at all for a culture safer for women, just ramp up the suspicion of rape claims. You eat up cases like this so that you have "precedent" to immediately shout down claims. Progress.
So women lie, there is no problem, and even if there is, we simply can't act upon it at all. Three cheers for the status quo. Bravo !
Because your demand is to change the rules of evidence where women are automatically believed and any innocent men caught up in that is just acceptable collateral damage to you.
You want to suggest reasonable actions on how to improve things for rape victims, I'm all ears. Actions that don't demonize all men or treat them as scapegoats.
But what are those suggestions? We already denounce sexual assault in our culture, have some pretty stiff penalties for it. You want to increase penalties, fine. It won't accomplish much, but might make you feel better.
One suggestions I have is we quit calling everything sexual assault, find more specific terms. Right now an unwanted pat on the butt is reported as the same crime as rape.
The other one that comes to my mind is for women to be more assertive and cautious with men. We know there's a certain percentage of scumbags out there that will take advantage, we know they haven't decreased the more we have condemned it. So women, be less trusting of guys you put yourself in vulnerable situations with, and quit playing the no means try harder game.
I personally don't know any men who would use force to get sex from a woman. I would guess guys like that hang out with each other, so expecting them to morally censure each other seems like a lost cause. But hey, some of the consent education to roundly condemned here might help some. Getting young guys (high school age) in groups and discussing the matter might help.
I'm open to any suggestion you may have that doesn't just demonize and sacrifice men at the altar of women must be believed.
Victims should always be believed.
The facts should always be belived.
Victims should always be believed.
The facts should always be belived.
His was a tongue-in-cheek comment.
Thing is, even if the courts rely on the facts, public opinion is a different matter.
the problem is that unequivocal facts are often hard to come by, especially in these situations. Absent of hard facts, the decision has to favor the accused, or we have to change our whole justice system.
Yup, "he says, she says" should be thrown out without any other proof. When we don't, false-witches are burned at the stake.