news Canadian News
Good Evening Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Ex-military man planned attack on Veterans Affa

Canadian Content
20680news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Ex-military man planned attack on Veterans Affairs office in Calgary skyscraper


Law & Order | 206800 hits | Nov 07 6:35 am | Posted by: Regina
31 Comment

A Calgary man who served in the military has pleaded guilty to weapons charges after police uncovered a plot to attack a downtown Calgary skyscraper that houses a Veteran Affairs Canada office.

Comments

  1. by avatar andyt
    Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:12 pm
    why the publication ban here? Others planning terrorism were not so protected.

  2. by Regina  Gold Member
    Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:28 pm
    "andyt" said
    why the publication ban here? Others planning terrorism were not so protected.

    GG told officers he intended to commit suicide. He was arrested under the Mental Health Act and taken to hospital for treatment.
    Temporary publication ban

    Defence lawyer Tonii Roulston had asked the judge for a publication ban to protect GG and his wife from public retaliation.

    "I am not seeking to have the facts of this case quashed or that these facts not be heard by members of the public," said Roulston. "Here, there is some substantial harm that is real.

  3. by avatar andyt
    Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:37 pm
    Protect him and his family from retaliation. We don't seem that squeamish with other people charged with crimes like this.

  4. by Regina  Gold Member
    Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:40 pm
    "andyt" said
    Protect him and his family from retaliation. We don't seem that squeamish with other people charged with crimes like this.

    Did you not read that he was arrested under "The Mental Health Act"?

  5. by avatar andyt
    Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:47 pm
    A Calgary man who once worked in military intelligence has pleaded guilty to firearms and explosives charges, after police found evidence suggesting he was planning an attack on a downtown Calgary skyscraper that houses a Veteran Affairs Canada office.


    Nothing to do with Mental health act, he's pleaded guilty to a crime. Vince Li was not under a publication ban. And how does being arrested under the mental health act mean his wife requires protection?

  6. by Regina  Gold Member
    Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:48 pm
    "andyt" said
    A Calgary man who once worked in military intelligence has pleaded guilty to firearms and explosives charges, after police found evidence suggesting he was planning an attack on a downtown Calgary skyscraper that houses a Veteran Affairs Canada office.


    Nothing to do with Mental health act, he's pleaded guilty to a crime. Vince Li was not under a publication ban. And how does being arrested under the mental health act mean his wife requires protection?

    You're obviously WAY smarter than those involved.

  7. by avatar andyt
    Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:58 pm
    Is that your usual response to a publication ban? "The smart people know what they're doing, who am I to question them?" Usual response to court decisions in general?

  8. by avatar CDN_PATRIOT
    Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:58 pm
    "andyt" said
    why the publication ban here? Others planning terrorism were not so protected.


    He's former military, holds a grudge against the government, and was about to go postal, but you consider him to be a terrorist? Is everyone in the U.S. that goes postal a terrorist? The guy has mental health issues, and some weapons. That makes him a first class nutbar, but hardly a terrorist. Do you see him yelling JIHAD, or doing this in the name of a God? He's pissed at a government agency, and wants a piece of them.

    I'm not at all defending what he could have done, as someone like this is clearly dangerous. Instead of hanging out on your PC all day waiting to troll something like this, why don't you go out into the world, and do some good, Andy.

    -J.

  9. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Fri Nov 07, 2014 4:00 pm
    The publication ban is pointless since we're talking about it. :idea:

  10. by Regina  Gold Member
    Fri Nov 07, 2014 4:04 pm
    "BartSimpson" said
    The publication ban is pointless since we're talking about it. :idea:

    There's temporary ban on his name only.

  11. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Fri Nov 07, 2014 4:07 pm
    Ah. Thank you.

  12. by avatar andyt
    Fri Nov 07, 2014 4:10 pm
    "CDN_PATRIOT" said
    why the publication ban here? Others planning terrorism were not so protected.


    He's former military, holds a grudge against the government, and was about to go postal, but you consider him to be a terrorist? Is everyone in the U.S. that goes postal a terrorist? The guy has mental health issues, and some weapons. That makes him a first class nutbar, but hardly a terrorist. Do you see him yelling JIHAD, or doing this in the name of a God? He's pissed at a government agency, and wants a piece of them.

    I'm not at all defending what he could have done, as someone like this is clearly dangerous. Instead of hanging out on your PC all day waiting to troll something like this, why don't you go out into the world, and do some good, Andy.

    -J.

    I don't usually respond to you, Mr "lets get some" but:

    Holding a grudge against the govt and wanting to blow it up seems like the definition of terrorism to me. Didn't know only those yelling jihad qualified, or that terrorism is only done for religious reasons.

    So let me see if I've got it straight. Being mentally ill and drug addicted (that's actually redundant) and attacking parliament while yelling jihad makes you a terrorist (I agree) and only those commie symps in the NDP say otherwise. Being suicidal, holding a grudge against the govt and plotting to blow up veterans affairs, why shucks you're just a good ole boy deserving spatial consideration. Is that it?

  13. by Regina  Gold Member
    Fri Nov 07, 2014 4:13 pm
    "andyt" said
    Is that your usual response to a publication ban? "The smart people know what they're doing, who am I to question them?" Usual response to court decisions in general?

    In your case..........the shoe usually fits.

  14. by avatar andyt
    Fri Nov 07, 2014 4:16 pm
    That is a non-sequitur and doesn't answer my question. do you never question court decisions because you think smarter people than you made them?



view comments in forum
Page 1 2 3

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net