 Winnipeg police warn of pedophile's releaseLaw & Order | 207004 hits | Jan 09 11:36 am | Posted by: DrCaleb  Police are warning the public about the release of a convicted pedophile considered to be a high risk to re-offend. Ryan James Gabourie, 32, will be released from Headingley Correctional Institution Thursday after serving sentences for breaching the condiCommentsview comments in forum Page 1 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
Then why the hell is he being let out?!!!
....and let them know where his body was dropped
If there really is a God...
Then why the hell is he being let out?!!!
Because you have shitty laws when it comes to these things.
Then why the hell is he being let out?!!!
Because you have shitty laws when it comes to these things.
That about sums it up.
Then why the hell is he being let out?!!!
Because you have shitty laws when it comes to these things.
When it comes to matters such as this there should only be one universal law-'The Law of The Jungle'!
I suppose it would be too obvious of me to ask why can't he be declared a "dangerous offender' and kept in?
I'm not well versed in Canadian law. Can the do that?
I suppose it would be too obvious of me to ask why can't he be declared a "dangerous offender' and kept in?
I'm not well versed in Canadian law. Can the do that?
Yes, and no. Anyone can be deemed a dangerous offender for any crime by the Crown, the problem comes in them trying to prove they are not likely to prove a danger to the public.
I don't think it's a flaw in the system that people serve their time and are released. I do think it's a flaw that these people aren't subject to stricter treatment while incarcerated to reduce their likelihood to re-offend.
That being said . . . get a rope.
I suppose it would be too obvious of me to ask why can't he be declared a "dangerous offender' and kept in?
This. Some of the most vicious predators are released because they "served their time" while others are declared dangerous or at least long term offenders and kept in much longer. Makes no sense. there should be some more formal mechanism that pushes the crown to make a dangerous offender application - severity of crime and number of offences and likelihood of recidivism. Sort of a 3 strikes law that's more intelligently applied than it was in the US (for stealing a slice of pizza, say).