news Canadian News
Good Evening Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

400-year-old skeleton of aboriginal woman found

Canadian Content
20694news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

400-year-old skeleton of aboriginal woman found in Sarnia backyard costs couple $5,000


History | 206938 hits | Jun 18 1:07 pm | Posted by: commanderkai
12 Comment

The story of Nicole Sauve, who found 400-year-old bones in her Point Edward backyard, was ordered to hire an archaeologist, and is now saddled with a $5,000 bill.

Comments

  1. by avatar commanderkai
    Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:30 pm
    Wow, that sucks. These Canadians discover an archeological find, and report it to the proper authorities, and they have to pay such a huge amount of money for it? That's not right. They did the right thing to report it, expanding our heritage and knowledge about Canada's history, and they get penalized for it.

    Pretty sad.

  2. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:42 pm
    "commanderkai" said
    Wow, that sucks. These Canadians discover an archeological find, and report it to the proper authorities, and they have to pay such a huge amount of money for it? That's not right. They did the right thing to report it, expanding our heritage and knowledge about Canada's history, and they get penalized for it.

    Pretty sad.


    The next such discovery will be properly destroyed and obliterated because of this dick move by the 'proper authorities'. Thanks, .

  3. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:45 pm
    Spence told the Star that the skeleton was that of a woman who was about 24 years old when she died, probably in the late 1500s or early 1600s.


    How'd they know she was 24? Why not 'mid-twenties'?

  4. by avatar raydan
    Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:47 pm
    "BartSimpson" said
    Spence told the Star that the skeleton was that of a woman who was about 24 years old when she died, probably in the late 1500s or early 1600s.


    How'd they know she was 24? Why not 'mid-twenties'?

    Health insurance card.

  5. by avatar Robair
    Tue Jun 18, 2013 9:15 pm
    I generally try to keep backyard skeletons under wraps.

  6. by avatar ShepherdsDog
    Tue Jun 18, 2013 9:45 pm
    there are plenty of such finds that go unreported when excavations are being done.....can't have a few ancient bones or artifacts holding up modern progress and construction projects :wink:

  7. by avatar ShepherdsDog
    Tue Jun 18, 2013 9:46 pm
    "BartSimpson" said
    Spence told the Star that the skeleton was that of a woman who was about 24 years old when she died, probably in the late 1500s or early 1600s.


    How'd they know she was 24? Why not 'mid-twenties'?


    was ray hitting on the remains?

  8. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:38 pm
    "Robair" said
    I generally try to keep backyard skeletons under wraps.


    I generally try to keep skeletons in someone else's backyard.

  9. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:38 pm
    "ShepherdsDog" said
    Spence told the Star that the skeleton was that of a woman who was about 24 years old when she died, probably in the late 1500s or early 1600s.


    How'd they know she was 24? Why not 'mid-twenties'?


    was ray hitting on the remains?

    :lol:

  10. by avatar Brenda
    Tue Jun 18, 2013 11:10 pm
    "BartSimpson" said
    Spence told the Star that the skeleton was that of a woman who was about 24 years old when she died, probably in the late 1500s or early 1600s.


    How'd they know she was 24? Why not 'mid-twenties'?

    They can tell how old she was, but not in what century? :P

  11. by avatar fifeboy
    Tue Jun 18, 2013 11:13 pm
    "BartSimpson" said
    I generally try to keep backyard skeletons under wraps.


    I generally try to keep skeletons in someone else's backyard.
    Not in your closet?

  12. by avatar Brenda
    Tue Jun 18, 2013 11:27 pm
    "fifeboy" said
    I generally try to keep backyard skeletons under wraps.


    I generally try to keep skeletons in someone else's backyard.
    Not in your closet?
    That's where he put his closet

  13. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Tue Jun 18, 2013 11:33 pm
    "fifeboy" said

    I generally try to keep skeletons in someone else's backyard.

    Not in your closet?

    I just did a project in the house where I lined all of the closets with cedar. Musty old skeletons would kind of mess up the entire effort.



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net