![]() Maclean's strikes back after Charest criticismMisc CDN | 208090 hits | Sep 29 6:15 pm | Posted by: wildrosegirl Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Who voted on this?
|
Quebec bashing my ass, they clearly said it wasn't to be interpreted as a condemnation of the people. There is definitely more POLITICAL scandals coming out of Quebec and the Quebec govt. I look at it like this, if someone called me gay, it wouldn't real bother me, I would let it be known that it was untrue but I would leave it at that, secure in my own knowledge of my sexuality. But if I was trying to hide it I would make a big show and dance about it, maybe try and divert attention away from the subject, or go way overboard trying to deny it, just like the govt is doing right now.
QFT
Another thing, Maclean's also indicated that they've run hard-hitting articles before that have been about the faults of a particular province, yet it's only in Quebec that people seem to get in such a state of mind as to suggest that by highlighting and pointing out a province's flaws, it's bashing the province.
*sigh* Why do so many Quebecers have to be so damn reactionary? The article and Maclean's aren't condemning Quebec or its people, but the political situation there. Let's face it, Maclean's pretty much nailed it with this one. Sure, there's corruption everywhere but it's so widespread and open in Quebec.
Another thing, Maclean's also indicated that they've run hard-hitting articles before that have been about the faults of a particular province, yet it's only in Quebec that people seem to get in such a state of mind as to suggest that by highlighting and pointing out a province's flaws, it's bashing the province.
That is because no matter how corrupt they are they are better than the rest of Canada and questioning them or their anti-English laws must be bashing them.
*sigh* Why do so many Quebecers have to be so damn reactionary? The article and Maclean's aren't condemning Quebec or its people, but the political situation there. Let's face it, Maclean's pretty much nailed it with this one. Sure, there's corruption everywhere but it's so widespread and open in Quebec.
Another thing, Maclean's also indicated that they've run hard-hitting articles before that have been about the faults of a particular province, yet it's only in Quebec that people seem to get in such a state of mind as to suggest that by highlighting and pointing out a province's flaws, it's bashing the province.
That is because no matter how corrupt they are they are better than the rest of Canada and questioning them or their anti-English laws must be bashing them.
Well, that's bashing, dude.
*sigh* Why do so many Quebecers have to be so damn reactionary? The article and Maclean's aren't condemning Quebec or its people, but the political situation there. Let's face it, Maclean's pretty much nailed it with this one. Sure, there's corruption everywhere but it's so widespread and open in Quebec.
Another thing, Maclean's also indicated that they've run hard-hitting articles before that have been about the faults of a particular province, yet it's only in Quebec that people seem to get in such a state of mind as to suggest that by highlighting and pointing out a province's flaws, it's bashing the province.
You sir have displayed so much ignorance in that post that I won't bother answer it properly. In anycase, maybe you should check news from Quebec to begin with.
*sigh* Why do so many Quebecers have to be so damn reactionary? The article and Maclean's aren't condemning Quebec or its people, but the political situation there. Let's face it, Maclean's pretty much nailed it with this one. Sure, there's corruption everywhere but it's so widespread and open in Quebec.
Another thing, Maclean's also indicated that they've run hard-hitting articles before that have been about the faults of a particular province, yet it's only in Quebec that people seem to get in such a state of mind as to suggest that by highlighting and pointing out a province's flaws, it's bashing the province.
You sir have displayed so much ignorance in that post that I won't bother answer it properly. In anycase, maybe you should check news from Quebec to begin with.
And you just totally proved MY point.
How exactly is it bashing when it brings to light a troubling issue in the province? Instead of actually trying to address what the article mentions, you immediately descended into verbal accusations of ignorance and failing to provide any examples to the contrary.
P.S. I live in Ottawa, date a French chick from Aylmer, and my dad lives in Gatineau. I speak French and have read the news in Quebec.
Hopefully enough other media outlets and public figures will keep this kind of stuff up until more Quebecois can learn that it's ok to criticise, and that it's not always "bashing" every time someone dares to say Quebec isn't perfect.