![]() Outrage after twice-accused drunk driver walksLaw & Order | 206835 hits | Sep 14 9:01 am | Posted by: Strutz Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Who voted on this?
|
Lawyers have to do what's best for their client. That's how the system works, and they can be sued if they don't. Nope, I blame the gummint for this one.
+1 that's the defence lawyers job, but it's not the gubmint's fault. The rules of evidence have become so convoluted and ritualistic that they must be followed exactly and in a specific order, and even not following the process can result in dismissal.
It's all the courts' fault there.
Well, at least he walked. Would have been worse if he drove.