news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

4 Mounties under investigation for jail sex inc

Canadian Content
20856news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

4 Mounties under investigation for jail sex incident


Law & Order | 208564 hits | Aug 31 3:11 pm | Posted by: Hyack
16 Comment

Police have confirmed that four male Mounties in Kamloops, B.C., are under investigation for allegedly watching a sexual encounter between two female prisoners on closed-circuit video for seven minutes without intervening.

Comments

  1. by avatar tritium
    Wed Sep 01, 2010 8:55 am
    Your in a public place, prision and you know you're under surveillance.

    This shouldn't even be news, and ther officers got a free show from a couple of cheap whores.

  2. by avatar ShepherdsDog
    Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:50 am
    It's a fucking holding cell, not a damned hotel room.

    When I worked in the RCMP holding cells up north, the cameras were installed so that the prisoner was always visible, including when using the shitter. The cells often had more than one occupant so privacy wasn't possible, or even a consideration.

    If all the cells are being occupied, the women are kept together, and all the cops could do was tell them to stop. In an extreme situation, they could have handcuffed them, I guess, but then they'd likely get shit on for doing that. I remember once, going into the detachment, and one of the constables asking me, "Have you ever seen a Trout and a Duck fuck?" These are common Cree surnames. You also never knew who had HIV or TB when they were spitting at you, or if they were bloody.

    One thing is for sure, you sure saw some 'interesting' sights. Some girl trying to drown herself in the shitter was likely one of the funniest ones.

  3. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Thu Sep 02, 2010 4:36 am
    They were placed in the same cell at the detachment, where they, "began to engage in what appeared to be consensual sexual contact," Shields said in a press release.


    And the problem is?????????????????????????????????????????

  4. by avatar Dragom
    Thu Sep 02, 2010 4:40 am
    I am confused about the exact nature of the allegations of wrong doing as well.

  5. by avatar stratos
    Thu Sep 02, 2010 5:47 am
    "Dragom" said
    I am confused about the exact nature of the allegations of wrong doing as well.


    Ok this is going off of 10yrs ago when I worked corrections in Texas so laws can be very diffrent. Inside a jail be it holding cell all the way up. Sexual intercourse/contact is forbidden. Under no circumstane is there ever to be sexual contact. Where the guards failed was in not stepping in and stoping the woman and if they did not complay they should have seperated them.

    Thing is this goes on almost every night in every drunk tank in the world drunk females getting it on. So why the big news event on this one. There is a mention of HIV for one of the woman and thats the only reason I could think of and even thats uncomfirmed.

  6. by avatar herbie
    Thu Sep 02, 2010 5:51 am
    I can't believe all the self-righteous BS spewing on the radio shows over this.

    a) They're SUPPOSED to watch the prisoners in the cell all the time, especially after all this shit of suicides and claims of brutality
    b) Where does it say you can't fuck in a jail cell?
    c) IT'S TWO WOMEN DOING IT!!! If you don't watch you have the problem. You're a homo or some kind of repressed Jesus freak.

    So really. They were acting and doing their job exactly like they're supposed to. Are you jealous YOU didn't get a free peep show, whiners?
    Like honestly, there's two chicks doing it right in front of your face. If you think the proper response is to rush over and make them to stop you're the sick fuck!

  7. by avatar ShepherdsDog
    Thu Sep 02, 2010 6:19 am
    "herbie" said
    I can't believe all the self-righteous BS spewing on the radio shows over this.

    a) They're SUPPOSED to watch the prisoners in the cell all the time, especially after all this shit of suicides and claims of brutality
    b) Where does it say you can't fuck in a jail cell?
    c) IT'S TWO WOMEN DOING IT!!! If you don't watch you have the problem. You're a homo or some kind of repressed Jesus freak.

    So really. They were acting and doing their job exactly like they're supposed to. Are you jealous YOU didn't get a free peep show, whiners?
    Like honestly, there's two chicks doing it right in front of your face. If you think the proper response is to rush over and make them to stop you're the sick fuck!


    .....at least

  8. by avatar coaster_dot
    Thu Sep 02, 2010 6:20 am
    "herbie" said
    I can't believe all the self-righteous BS spewing on the radio shows over this.

    a) They're SUPPOSED to watch the prisoners in the cell all the time, especially after all this shit of suicides and claims of brutality
    b) Where does it say you can't fuck in a jail cell?
    c) IT'S TWO WOMEN DOING IT!!! If you don't watch you have the problem. You're a homo or some kind of repressed Jesus freak.

    So really. They were acting and doing their job exactly like they're supposed to. Are you jealous YOU didn't get a free peep show, whiners?
    Like honestly, there's two chicks doing it right in front of your face. If you think the proper response is to rush over and make them to stop you're the sick fuck!


    This post made my night!

  9. by avatar Hyack
    Thu Sep 02, 2010 6:23 am
    Police later said they believed at least one of the women was too intoxicated to legally consent to sex, and the officers had a duty to ensure the women came to no harm while they were in custody.

  10. by digerdick
    Thu Sep 02, 2010 6:41 am
    the one woman admitted to the RCMP and the jailhouse staff she was HIV-positive when she was threw in the drunk tank. now when she was having sex with another female who was drunk and did not give her consent to the act because she was drunk and perhaps contracted HIV.

    Both these women were in the custody of the RCMP,and what did they do??

    they watched, as a woman may have contracted HIV while in their custody.

    would have they, sat and watched for seven minutes if the one-woman was strangling the other woman to death.................I certainly hope not.

  11. by avatar Dragom
    Thu Sep 02, 2010 6:20 pm
    "diggerdick" said
    they watched, as a woman may have contracted HIV while in their custody.


    Without using a sharp tool that would have been impossible.

  12. by digerdick
    Thu Sep 02, 2010 6:45 pm
    So you obviously, don't believe someone can draw blood by biting someone else.

    I'm fed up with people trying to make apologetic excuses , for the misconduct of the RCMP and the moral decay of many of their members.

  13. by avatar andyt
    Thu Sep 02, 2010 6:55 pm
    If the cops had gone in to break it up, people would be up in arms about that. And since they're dykes the cops would be called homophobic. If you don't want to be watched having sex in jail, either don't get yourself thrown in jail or don't have sex. Simple, really.

  14. by digerdick
    Thu Sep 02, 2010 7:18 pm
    would have they, sat and watched for seven minutes if the one-woman was strangling the other woman to death.................



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net