news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Semrau hopes to continue soldiering

Canadian Content
20698news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Semrau hopes to continue soldiering


Military | 206966 hits | Jul 22 12:37 am | Posted by: Hyack
12 Comment

TORONTO - As he uneasily awaits sentencing for “disgraceful behaviour” in the shooting death of a wounded Taliban insurgent in Afghanistan in 2008, Capt. Robert Semrau has for the first time expressed his feelings on the case.

Comments

  1. by avatar martin14
    Thu Jul 22, 2010 6:38 pm
    Hope he can continue, for his sake.

    And ours.

  2. by avatar martin14
    Thu Jul 22, 2010 6:38 pm

  3. by avatar andyt
    Thu Jul 22, 2010 6:43 pm
    Retired Maj.-Gen. Lewis MacKenzie, with more field command than most, has noted that Semrau’s “judgment call” in the heat of battle, was “appropriate.”


    Good for him. The Army would be a fool to lose this guy.

  4. by Nuggie77
    Thu Jul 22, 2010 6:54 pm
    Glad to hear he was found "not guilty". Just to be the cynical guy that I am, I would be interested to see the results had he been a private. In the CF, the shit (and blame) usually rolls down to lowest level.

  5. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Thu Jul 22, 2010 7:12 pm
    Hate to say, but offing the Taliban in the field is SOP anymore. The creeps learned that if they're taken alive to whine that someone violated their rights as a means of demoralizing the military. Consequently the troops in the field have the choice of shooting the Tallywackers during battle or taking the risk to their reputation and career of securing them and bringing them in. Not much of a choice to me.

  6. by avatar andyt
    Thu Jul 22, 2010 7:30 pm
    "BartSimpson" said
    Hate to say, but offing the Taliban in the field is SOP .


    That's the second time you've used anymore in this way. Do I take it you mean "but offing the Taliban in the field is SOP"

  7. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Thu Jul 22, 2010 7:32 pm
    Different way of wording it, but sure.

  8. by avatar SprCForr  Gold Member
    Thu Jul 22, 2010 7:35 pm
    I hope he can too. I also hope the CoC realizes it was a command decision based on compassion rather than malice and they don't hold it against him.

  9. by avatar GreenTiger
    Thu Jul 22, 2010 7:43 pm
    "BartSimpson" said
    Different way of wording it, but sure.


    Use a phrase in science that I learned from the Director of the Hayden Planetarium Neil D. Tyson: The Captain merely helped this hostile meet his "event horizon". Doesn't that sound better than offing the bastard.

  10. by avatar andyt
    Thu Jul 22, 2010 7:48 pm
    "GreenTiger" said
    Different way of wording it, but sure.


    Use a phrase in science that I learned from the Director of the Hayden Planetarium Neil D. Tyson: The Captain merely helped this hostile meet his "event horizon". Doesn't that sound better than offing the SOB?

    You mean deny him his essence?

  11. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Thu Jul 22, 2010 8:01 pm
    I'm not trying to provoke anyone here, just pointing out that the people who go into battle for our countries are pretty sharp and that they can figure out the best way to cover their six in any given situation.

    In battle you get to make choices while the lead is flying. That means when confronted with the potentially career-ending, reputation-ending, and potentially incarcerating choice of letting someone live who would never give you the same courtesy when you could just do him and be done with it and no one...not even your foes commanders...will care, what do you do?

  12. by avatar GreenTiger
    Thu Jul 22, 2010 8:41 pm
    "BartSimpson" said
    I'm not trying to provoke anyone here, just pointing out that the people who go into battle for our countries are pretty sharp and that they can figure out the best way to cover their six in any given situation.

    In battle you get to make choices while the lead is flying. That means when confronted with the potentially career-ending, reputation-ending, and potentially incarcerating choice of letting someone live who would never give you the same courtesy when you could just do him and be done with it and no one...not even your foes commanders...will care, what do you do?


    Will not trying to provoke anyone either is essence of war hasn't changed much. and I still recall General Patton's assertion that "no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country.

    I'd rather see taliban casualties than the flag draped caskets that come into Dover AFB frequently.



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • martin14 Thu Jul 22, 2010 10:37 am
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net