news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Sex deviant not dangerous offender: lawyer

Canadian Content
20674news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Sex deviant not dangerous offender: lawyer


Law & Order | 206735 hits | Feb 06 8:16 am | Posted by: WDHIII
6 Comment

CALGARY - The Crown has failed to establish a repeat abuser with a sexual interest in young children and animals is a dangerous offender, his lawyer argued Friday.

Comments

  1. by avatar wildrosegirl
    Sat Feb 06, 2010 7:07 pm
    “There’s an almost 15-year gap from the date of the (last) sexual assault,” the lawyer said.


    All that means is he didn't get caught. I'm guessing that lawyer doesn't have any children of his own.

  2. by avatar GreenTiger
    Sat Feb 06, 2010 8:35 pm
    Perhaps Mark Gottlieb can prove that Charles Manson isn't dangerous in that he hasn't killed anyone in prison and should be released.

  3. by avatar andyt
    Sat Feb 06, 2010 8:52 pm
    "Honest your honor, he won't get caught for at least another 15 years if you let him go."

  4. by avatar TuavDan
    Sun Feb 07, 2010 1:04 am
    Go after the scum lawyers and the shit will go to jail and stay there like they deserve.

  5. by avatar ShepherdsDog
    Sun Feb 07, 2010 1:36 am
    The prosecution presented evidence Todd was “grooming” two young boys in 2005, or 2006, including one he had sit in his lap while the offender was naked.


    Seems if the defending attorney can overlook this, he's either an idiot.....or perhaps the police should be looking closer at him too, and maybe even a search of his premises may be in order, including his computers. What's next, is the lawyer going to declare that this monster's ravings have some artistic merit???

  6. by avatar GreenTiger
    Sun Feb 07, 2010 2:47 pm
    "ShepherdsDog" said
    The prosecution presented evidence Todd was “grooming” two young boys in 2005, or 2006, including one he had sit in his lap while the offender was naked.


    Seems if the defending attorney can overlook this, he's either an idiot.....or perhaps the police should be looking closer at him too, and maybe even a search of his premises may be in order, including his computers. What's next, is the lawyer going to declare that this monster's ravings have some artistic merit???


    This attorney is an idiot he is also a bottom feeder representing the worst in mankind.



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net