CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 12:07 pm
 


Title: Sex deviant not dangerous offender: lawyer
Category: Law & Order
Posted By: WDHIII
Date: 2010-02-06 08:16:00
Canadian


Offline
News Moderator
News Moderator
 Edmonton Oilers
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 19516

Warnings: (-20%)
PostPosted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 12:07 pm
 


$1:
“There’s an almost 15-year gap from the date of the (last) sexual assault,” the lawyer said.


All that means is he didn't get caught. I'm guessing that lawyer doesn't have any children of his own.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 New York Rangers
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11240
PostPosted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 1:35 pm
 


Perhaps Mark Gottlieb can prove that Charles Manson isn't dangerous in that he hasn't killed anyone in prison and should be released.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 1:52 pm
 


"Honest your honor, he won't get caught for at least another 15 years if you let him go."


Offline
Active Member
Active Member
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 387
PostPosted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 6:04 pm
 


Go after the scum lawyers and the shit will go to jail and stay there like they deserve.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 42160
PostPosted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 6:36 pm
 


$1:
The prosecution presented evidence Todd was “grooming” two young boys in 2005, or 2006, including one he had sit in his lap while the offender was naked.


Seems if the defending attorney can overlook this, he's either an idiot.....or perhaps the police should be looking closer at him too, and maybe even a search of his premises may be in order, including his computers. What's next, is the lawyer going to declare that this monster's ravings have some artistic merit???


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 New York Rangers
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11240
PostPosted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 7:47 am
 


ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:
$1:
The prosecution presented evidence Todd was “grooming” two young boys in 2005, or 2006, including one he had sit in his lap while the offender was naked.


Seems if the defending attorney can overlook this, he's either an idiot.....or perhaps the police should be looking closer at him too, and maybe even a search of his premises may be in order, including his computers. What's next, is the lawyer going to declare that this monster's ravings have some artistic merit???


This attorney is an idiot he is also a bottom feeder representing the worst in mankind.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.