![]() Taser inquiry lawyer seeks delay after email bombshellLaw & Order | 206638 hits | Jun 19 10:26 am | Posted by: Robair Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 2 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Who voted on this?
|
just disgraceful the way this has been handled.
8O
Well that changes a few things...
Not really. Not for me anyway. In the video you can hear them talking about using the taser before they've even approached him.
This could, however, be evidence of that "wall of blue" others have been talking about...
8O
Well that changes a few things...
Not really. Not for me anyway. In the video you can hear them talking about using the taser before they've even approached him.
This could, however, be evidence of that "wall of blue" others have been talking about...
It was the RCMP who gave it to them......although not in a timely fashion. I think it lends itself to the credibility of the officers involved. I just don't want to see this turned into a witch hunt that needs someone hung because there was a camera there. The man had a criminal record and should not have been allowed in the country or on the plane to this country.
It was the RCMP who gave it to them......although not in a timely fashion. I think it lends itself to the credibility of the officers involved.
The man had a criminal record and should not have been allowed in the country or on the plane to this country.
Irrelevant.
Irrelevant.
Only relevant because that's why they weren't clearing him to go which caused the violent behavior. Poorly handled from there without a doubt.
Irrelevant.
Only relevant because that's why they weren't clearing him to go which caused the violent behavior. Poorly handled from there without a doubt.
He was cleared. He could have left at any time. That's always been one of the big questions. Why the hell did he stay in there for so long, and why didn't security toss him out.
I completely support the actions of the police right up to the point they ignored him on the floor (when he died) and then lied about it all after the fact.
I don't understand why there is a problem with the discussion between them about using the tazer before they got there. I would think as a team going into an informed situation they should have a plan of action. I would think heading into something like that, not having some sort of plan would also be a disaster in the making.
If they lied about having / not having a plan,
gotta wonder what else did they lie about ?
It turns the whole thing into a circus.. police officers lying on the
stand .. yup, dont that look nice..
And these guys are still on the job
Now, if the senior officers are discussing, "Constable So and So told me they had a plan to taser him before they went in..." then I agree, that's perjury and there's got to be some serious house-cleaning and jail time.
I'd like to see the contents of the email before rushing to judgement on it.
Perhaps it's time to break up the RCMP altogether and require all the provinces to take over the policing of their own jurisdictions, including providing the on-site security at the major airports. The RCMP might be better suited to become more like the FBI and concentrate mostly on domestic intelligence gathering, anti-terrorism, and anti-organized crime instead of continuing on as a uniformed patrol force. Aside from another massive and costly investigation to find out what's structurally wrong with the RCMP it might be better to have them shed the more mundane aspects of policing altogether if they can't do these things right any more.