 If NAFTA opened, oil could be on table Democratic presidential candidates calling for renegotiations may not know just how good the U.S. has it under the deal.Commentsview comments in forum You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
Then where are we going to get refined gasoline and diesel from?
Maybe we will build more refineries, which will lower our cost at the pump.
I like companies that care about Canadians and job creation. How about you Eisensapper?
http://www.irvingoil.com/company/refinery.asp
Of course oil would be on the table. Everything would be on the table. That's why there will be no serious re-negotiations.
Yup, that's why when ever any political leader says they are talking about it being on the table I know they are full of it.
If there was a clear plan showing that by 2015 we would have enough refineries ready to sustain 85% of Canada's fuel consumption, I would support it completely. I really don’t see that ever happening though. Canada is just not industrial enough, and it seems like majority of Canadians are just crazy about climate change to allow the government to become more industrial.
http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=610810
So what changes do you propose the Alberta Oil Sands will make? if any?
If Obama wins, it will not only be a turning point for the United States, but just as big for Canada.
...and where would be build them?
Hopefully close to the oil sands, which is already an environmental catastrophe, can't fuck up Alberta more than it already is..
I have been hearing that the oil sands arent really any worse of then any other oil pumping site across the world. People just assume the worst because the area looks like a strip mine.
ha... ha...
I have been hearing that the oil sands arent really any worse of then any other oil pumping site across the world. People just assume the worst because the area looks like a strip mine.
I am sure will be glad to hear your opinion.
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/economy/#trade
Enough with the news sources that are generally bios one way or another. Read it on Obama's web site.
Obama is a protectionist, that is why I have said it before. Obama is just Lou Dobbs in a black man's body.
NDP Leader Jack Layton opposes Free Trade with US Protectionist and CNN host Lou Dobbs. Jack has finally found someone in the USA (other than Ralph Nader) who agrees with his anti Free Trade view.
this guy makes me smile. He lives in a world that no one else does.
grow up. Sorry there will always be 'the bottom of the barrel' in any society. Frankly tough shit we have enough social programs already. I am not going to let the defence budget be re-directed to social welfare.
Lou was fucking laughing at him, and so was I!!!
Thats possible but it would take years before these refineries were up and running, and where would be build them? This would also be after the ruling government has tackled all the lobby groups and the opposition keeping new refineries out of Canada.
If there was a clear plan showing that by 2015 we would have enough refineries ready to sustain 85% of Canada's fuel consumption, I would support it completely. I really don’t see that ever happening though. Canada is just not industrial enough, and it seems like majority of Canadians are just crazy about climate change to allow the government to become more industrial.
Where would we build them? On all the open space Canada has, Canada has the most land mass yet such a low population. All that land, without that many people will bound to equal a lot of land up for grabs.
Thats possible but it would take years before these refineries were up and running, and where would be build them? This would also be after the ruling government has tackled all the lobby groups and the opposition keeping new refineries out of Canada.
If there was a clear plan showing that by 2015 we would have enough refineries ready to sustain 85% of Canada's fuel consumption, I would support it completely. I really don’t see that ever happening though. Canada is just not industrial enough, and it seems like majority of Canadians are just crazy about climate change to allow the government to become more industrial.
Where would we build them? On all the open space Canada has, Canada has the most land mass yet such a low population. All that land, without that many people will bound to equal a lot of land up for grabs.
No wonder the Green Party is kicking the NDP's ass. http://www.greenparty.ca/en/node/3149
How about building the refineries close to the source of the raw product??
Less environmental impact, less transportation costs or a chance of an incident.
Build a couple of refineries, one in Ft Mac and another in northern Sask?
Thats possible but it would take years before these refineries were up and running, and where would be build them? This would also be after the ruling government has tackled all the lobby groups and the opposition keeping new refineries out of Canada.
If there was a clear plan showing that by 2015 we would have enough refineries ready to sustain 85% of Canada's fuel consumption, I would support it completely. I really don’t see that ever happening though. Canada is just not industrial enough, and it seems like majority of Canadians are just crazy about climate change to allow the government to become more industrial.
Shell cancels Sarnia, Ont., refinery for oilsands crude