Florida lawmakers consider bill banning ornamental testicles


Uncle Sam | 207650 hits | Apr 26 6:46 pm | Posted by: Hyack
14 Comment

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. - They're proudly displayed by any self-respecting bull, but dangling big metal ones on the back end of a truck could be banned in Florida.

Comments

  1. by avatar QBC
    Sat Apr 26, 2008 7:58 pm
    Law makers in Florida have nuthin better to do then this??... :lol:

  2. by sasquatch2
    Tue Apr 29, 2008 6:49 pm
    Both federal and provincial parliments/legistlatures in Canada have all manner of wierd Private Members Bills floating about. why should Florida be different?
    Actually the Balls on a trucks rear bumper sounds hilarious.

  3. by avatar dino_bobba_renno
    Tue Apr 29, 2008 7:55 pm
    You know, I see trucks driving around Calgary with these and I can't help but agree that they should be banned. You just have to love it when your 6 year old daughter asks "Daddy what are those?". Beside they are a fricken eye sore. How much of a dumb ass do you have to be to even put these on your vehicle?

    If people don't have enough common sense to know that these things are in bad taste then they should be banned.

  4. by Anonymous
    Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:02 pm
    it's already an old joke past it's due day...I also think they are ridiculous...


    compensating for something perhaps.

  5. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:15 pm
    As long as they're ornamental ones only, I've got no problem. It's when the real thing starts to appear that we have to worry, especially if parents aren't quick witted enough to give their child some cock and bull story to answer their question.

  6. by Chumley
    Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:21 pm
    I am tired of people trying to oppress my ornamental testicles. Next thing, I won't be allowed to have christmas lights on my dick when I am caroling.

  7. by avatar Brenda
    Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:32 pm
    I have NO clue what they are talking about... Anyone care to place a pic? :?

  8. by Anonymous
    Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:38 pm

  9. by avatar hurley_108
    Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:39 pm
    I like them. They help identify the guys who haven't got any real ones.

  10. by avatar Brenda
    Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:49 pm
    Thank you!

    So what's the fuzz all about? You can't have this but you can have that little fish thingy? :? As long as it is not a danger, I don't see the problem...

  11. by avatar bootlegga
    Tue Apr 29, 2008 9:03 pm
    That's solid government folks!

    Right up there with these laws;

    http://informationcentral0.tripod.com/id7.html

  12. by avatar sandorski
    Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:02 am
    "Brenda" said
    Thank you!

    So what's the fuzz all about? You can't have this but you can have that little fish thingy? :? As long as it is not a danger, I don't see the problem...


    There's no fuzz on those. :D

    The fish is something else entirely, but I agree these Balls shouldn't be banned. They are a good IQ indicator!

  13. by avatar Brenda
    Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:07 am
    What is the difference? They both shows something.. The fish your faith, and the balls your (low) IQ :lol:

    I know some people that can use BOTH on their cars ROTFL ROTFL

  14. by ridenrain
    Wed Apr 30, 2008 1:34 am
    OMG. Next the kids are going to be wearing really baggy pants.



view comments in forum
You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile