news Canadian News
Good Evening Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Military boosts chopper firepower

Canadian Content
20674news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Military boosts chopper firepower


Military | 206732 hits | Feb 12 10:20 am | Posted by: Hyack
10 Comment

The Canadian military is looking at sending as many as six Griffon helicopters to Afghanistan to provide additional firepower and surveillance for troops

Comments

  1. by avatar uwish
    Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:32 pm
    At least the gov is listening to our generals. Under previous gov's the need to close air support and surveillance was outlined but they simply refused to spend the money on the needed equipment.

  2. by sasquatch2
    Tue Feb 12, 2008 7:53 pm
    Taliban jack will object, as will the Adoo, whom Layton will suggest should be consulted on this deployment.

  3. by avatar Newfy
    Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:01 pm
    It will be good to get more helicopters out there but I doubt that they will be only used for the Canadian troops as all air assets are controlled by a central command and are used as needed for whoever needs them.

  4. by avatar bootlegga
    Tue Feb 12, 2008 11:28 pm
    What? I thought Afghanistan was "too hot and high" for Griffons...at least that's the DND told the Senate last year.

  5. by avatar SigPig
    Tue Feb 12, 2008 11:44 pm
    "bootlegga" said
    What? I thought Afghanistan was "too hot and high" for Griffons...at least that's the DND told the Senate last year.


    I thought that is what they said too. Plus didn't they also say that there is enough offensive air power, its more TRANSPORT capability that is needed.

  6. by Normalguy
    Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:47 am
    We need the extra juice but like Newfy says.....

    And besides, the Griffon, oh please, a Liberal compromise after dumping the EH101. An unarmoured, essentially unarmed cam painted civilian chopper. And SigPig is also dead on, we need Chinooks!

    Remember the Liberal motto: Nothing is to good for the troops and that's what we give'em!

  7. by Normalguy
    Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:58 am
    Oh, and the mini guns they're talking about are outranged by Soviet built Iranian/Pakistani supplied 12.7mm Dshk heavy machine guns that'll go through'em like Stephan Dion and a copy of Das Kapital. More likely they'll be used as taxis for senior brass.

  8. by sasquatch2
    Wed Feb 13, 2008 5:12 am
    BTW there is a good ol boy, Inverted, who gets just a mite defensive about Griffins.

    Yeah there are a lot of DsK's in that neighbourhood but there is something more fearsome-----the soviets mounted it on wheels sized like a motorcycle.

    The KPV very heavy machine gun. 600 rd of 14.5x114....a cartridge designed for anti-tank rifles. This crosses the line from small arms into artillery IMHO.

    The Dsk is the rough equivalent of the .50 cal M2 Browning.

    The KPV is readily movable with a small crew unlike the 23MM cannon.

    The KPV can shoot up APCs easily.

    However if the KPV uses tracer, it had better connect with the first burst......them mini's can range out far enough to shred the crew of the KPV.

    Strellas are the biggest threat.......

  9. by Normalguy
    Thu Feb 14, 2008 11:53 pm
    Ack to that, my point was the far end of small arms and the ove-vulnerability of the Griffin. Your point well taken, wish more people had it as tight.

  10. by sasquatch2
    Fri Feb 15, 2008 6:16 pm
    Normalguy
    Ack to that, my point was the far end of small arms and the ove-vulnerability of the Griffin. Your point well taken, wish more people had it as tight.

    That comes from experience dealing with HINDs.

    The Soviet deployed KPVs to engage occupied ridgelines. We placed a high priority on their capture. Despite the prodigious range of a KPV, initialy I instituted a SOP of limiting enghagement range to 500m. First burst neutralized the HIND. A KPV would litteraly rip a HIND to pieces despite it's armour.
    Mujahideen approved------they liked being up close and personal.



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • allan_17 Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:32 pm
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net