![]() Canada's top court dismisses extradition appeal of suspect in U.S. slayingLaw & Order | 206418 hits | Dec 06 9:37 am | Posted by: Hyack Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Who voted on this?
|
Someone's gonna get fried. Crispy critter style and Dion will have another hissy fit.
He should get the Death Penalty for sure. (I hope)
I love to see these kind of changes in Canada. Bring back the death penalty!!!
I'm starting to like the Harper Government.
Who cares!! He killed 3 people, now he's gonna get what's coming to him.
I love to see these kind of changes in Canada. Bring back the death penalty!!!
I'm starting to like the Harper Government.
Who cares!! He killed 3 people, now he's gonna get what's coming to him.
Of course allegedly. Once he has gone through the trial in the United States and has been found guilty, I hope they setup a nice gurney for him to stretch out on.
I love to see these kind of changes in Canada. Bring back the death penalty!!!
1. I belive in the ultimate punishment for taking another persons life, especially one who has been sworn to protect the public such as a police officer or in this case 2 FBI officers.
2. I don't feel that Canadian tax payers should have to flip the bill and house murderers. With the advancement of DNA, and advanced policing I am confident in the CSI's and a jury to make the correct decision.
I'm starting to like the Harper Government.
The Montana fella where they didn't get involved and they have not yet become involved in this case.
( if you read article he's only geting life not death penalty for this murder)
( if you read article he's only geting life not death penalty for this murder )
...and once he crosses the border into U.S. custody, who says that will not change.
We have no jurisdiction of U.S. laws, or maybe I am just being optimistic.
I love to see these kind of changes in Canada. Bring back the death penalty!!!
1. I belive in the ultimate punishment for taking another persons life, especially one who has been sworn to protect the public such as a police officer or in this case 2 FBI officers.
2. I don't feel that Canadian tax payers should have to flip the bill and house murderers. With the advancement of DNA, and advanced policing I am confident in the CSI's and a jury to make the correct decision.In the US it costs quite a bit more to execute someone than it does to put him away for life. So that argument doesn't fly.
And you're confident? That's nice. No reasonable person should be. We have a long list of wrongly accused in Canada that would have been put to death if it was up to you. There will always be people involved in the justice system. As long as people are involved, there is a possibility of errors or even corruption. I do not trust the government with the right to take my life and neither should you.
As for your first reason, got no problem with that. There just isn't a fool proof system for deciding who gets snuffed.
And as for the guy in Montana, Harper has started down a slippery slope with that one. So now the prime minister decides who's life is worth saving? Bad idea, all they had to do was send a letter and maybe make a phone call.