news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Ottawa approves Trans Mountain pipeline, Line 3

Canadian Content
20693news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Ottawa approves Trans Mountain pipeline, Line 3


Business | 206925 hits | Nov 29 2:06 pm | Posted by: shockedcanadian
33 Comment

Long-stalled Northern Gateway project will not go ahead, Trudeau says

Comments

  1. by shockedcanadian
    Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:09 pm
    You win some you lose some. The country can balance business interests with environmental concerns, let's not cut off our nose to spite our faces any longer.

    Albertans will be happy, here in Ontario we will continue to fund failed businesses with grants and other taxpayer theft, instead of letting businesses risk their own investments and prove their value (such as in solar panels on homes).

    Something that cannot be overlooked, is that Trudeau suggested that these pipeline will ensure that they don't just need to rely on U.S consumption. In other words, we can expect that the XL pipeline will be used as currency to try and keep NAFTA intact.

    Appears he is a smarter negotiator than he thought.

  2. by avatar Mowich
    Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:55 pm
    Finally, a Liberal government decision that will be for the benefit of all Canadians, set in place restrictions to protect the environment and get a necessary part of our economy moving again. I applaud the government on these decisions including saying No to NG.

  3. by avatar Mowich
    Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:55 pm
    Finally, a Liberal government decision that will be for the benefit of all Canadians, set in place restrictions to protect the environment and get a necessary part of our economy moving again. I applaud the government on these decisions including saying No to NG.

  4. by avatar Mowich
    Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:55 pm
    Sorry .........double post

  5. by avatar Mowich
    Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:57 pm
    I am in total support of the government on these decisions. About damn time.

  6. by avatar Mowich
    Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:08 pm
    "shockedcanadian" said
    You win some you lose some. The country can balance business interests with environmental concerns, let's not cut off our nose to spite our faces any longer.

    Albertans will be happy, here in Ontario we will continue to fund failed businesses with grants and other taxpayer theft, instead of letting businesses risk their own investments and prove their value (such as in solar panels on homes).

    Something that cannot be overlooked, is that Trudeau suggested that these pipeline will ensure that they don't just need to rely on U.S consumption. In other words, we can expect that the XL pipeline will be used as currency to try and keep NAFTA intact.

    Appears he is a smarter negotiator than he thought.


    I have been against the NG project almost since its inception because of the involvement of Enbridge - a company who have proven to be untrustworthy when it comes to protecting the environment. I am also completely against the very idea of running a pipeline through the Great Bear Rain Forest - an issue that united many British Columbians who otherwise might have stayed on the sidelines.

    I am fully in support of Line 3 and Kinder Morgan.

  7. by avatar andyt
    Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:49 pm
    I was initially all for the Transmountain project until the Marathassa incident showed how poorly prepared we were for even a small spill. Real Keystone Cops response. I know Trudeau promised to upgrade spill response, but he's promised lots of things. And the costs for spill response should be borne by the oil companies, not the govt.

  8. by avatar BRAH
    Wed Nov 30, 2016 12:30 am
    Truth!

  9. by avatar herbie
    Wed Nov 30, 2016 1:13 am
    And Enbridge is finally DEAD!!!!!
    Tanker ban on the northern BC coast promised for spring session!!!
    The Skeena and Stuart river salmon will live to see another day.

  10. by avatar herbie
    Wed Nov 30, 2016 1:21 am
    Differing from you Mowich, I grew up in Burnaby and with the Chevron refinery so although I'm not going to wave flags in support I'm aware that KM pipeline is an expansion of a line that was always there and not the ecological horror that Enbridge threatend to become.
    But if you live down there, you're perfectly free and within your rights to disagree and protest. I share your concerns about increased tanker traffic and disgusted with our obsession to export raw shit so as to obtain the LEAST possible benefit from our resources.

  11. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:14 am
    Well done Mr. Prime Minister it's nice to see a little common sense used when weighing the potential benefits with the potential problems this pipeline might cause.

    Now, for entertainment, all we have to do is wait for the radical environuts to come out of the woodwork and start chaining themselves to the trees on Burnaby mountain while their heads explode.

  12. by rickc
    Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:44 am
    I think this pipeline is a good idea. I agree with Herbie that a refinery turning the bitumin into several different end products would be a MUCH better idea for Canada. The government of Canada should have made a refinery in Canada (and the jobs and tax base that go with it ) a condition for signing off on any pipeline. Oh well I guess half a loaf is better than none.

    The reality is that these days there is a big difference in approving a pipeline, and a pipeline actually being built. Just look at what is going on in North Dakota. The days of big oil throwing their weight (and money) around and always getting their way is over in North America. The BP disaster turned way too many hard working men (and women) who earned their living off of the sea, or in tourist destinations on the sea against big oil. Those blue collar workers who lost everything had to listen to some whistle prick CEO from BP whine about how he wished his life could just get back to normal after the spill. Bullshit like that loses a lot of goodwill. I was down in the panhandle this last july to visit an old Air Force buddy in Ft Walton Beach. I don't recall seeing a single BP station. Not a one. They had all been replaced with Marathon stations. People tend to have long memories when they get screwed over on a grand scale like that. I am sure that this line 3 will be no bed of roses to complete either. Anyways best of luck. The hard working people of Alberta have suffered enough.

  13. by avatar uwish
    Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:08 pm
    I knew the approval was coming as soon as the PM forced the carbon tax down the throats of the provinces. He thinks it gives him a social license, and in that regard as frustrating as that situation is to me, I welcome the news.

    I understand others who's position is to do more with the raw product than simply export it, but lets be honest. Refining is not something most energy companies want to do, there is a massive up front cost (>$5B) to just construct them never mind the cost associated with manufacturing anything.

    At least we are closer to having more than one market for our product, it would also be nice to see a pipeline heading east so that the rest of Canada would not have to import 2 million barrels a day from places like Saudi Arabia. The east is quick to denigrate oil, but seems to not mind overlooking where it's coming from. And if tankers are a huge issue for people on the west coast, then why are people in the east so oblivious to the tankers that dock there to unload crude? Seems to make much more sense to use oil from Canada than Venezuela and other banana republics that have a very spotty human rights record.

    Like most things in life, money talks and if you stop buying from places like that, it's the one way to start making change. The hipocracy of it all isn't lost on me, nor the irony.

  14. by avatar andyt
    Wed Nov 30, 2016 4:46 pm
    "rickc" said
    I think this pipeline is a good idea. I agree with Herbie that a refinery turning the bitumin into several different end products would be a MUCH better idea for Canada.


    The proposal to build a refinery in Kitimat is floundering, with experts saying it's not economically feasible to export refined products. Countries want their own refineries so they can produce what they want. Sure we should be building our own refineries, instead of re-importing the stuff from the US, but Canadians don't think like that. How can we make the easiest quick buck, never mind if that's in our long term interests.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2 3

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2026 by Canadaka.net