news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Young man killed in Raleigh shooting; homeowner

Canadian Content
20736news upnews down

Young man killed in Raleigh shooting; homeowner charged with murder | WNCN


Law & Order | 207355 hits | Aug 08 3:08 pm | Posted by: Delwin
12 Comment

A man was found shot in a home on Singleleaf Lane in Raleigh. He was pronounced dead at the hospital.

Comments

  1. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Mon Aug 08, 2016 10:20 pm
    If these peace loving, rainbows and unicorns, armed street racers were threatening him, good luck getting a conviction and if what supposedly transpired actually did, you can be assured that the arrest has more to do with politics and placating a bunch of self righteous idiots than it does with justice.


    About 7 minutes before that call about the shooting, another caller who claimed he was with the neighborhood watch complained about people on Singleleaf, requested police and said he was going to “secure the neighborhood.”

    “We got a bunch of hoodlums out here racing… I am locked and loaded and I am going outside to secure my neighborhood. You need to send PD as quickly as possible. I am going to secure my neighborhood. I am on the neighborhood watch. I am going to have my neighbors with me,” the caller said at 12:50 a.m.

    “There is hoodlums out here racing up and down the street. It’s 1 o’clock in the morning, there is some vandalism, they have firearms — and we are going to secure our neighborhood,” he said.

  2. by Thanos
    Mon Aug 08, 2016 10:34 pm
    If they were on his property then he'll be in the clear, as he should be if some fucking ignorant and malicious bongo-party invasion is ruining the civilized neighbourhoods, depending on what the inevitable barrage of poorly-shot (lol) cell camera videos show.

  3. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Mon Aug 08, 2016 10:40 pm
    It's North Carolina. The homeowner isn't going to be found guilty of anything.

  4. by avatar Delwin
    Mon Aug 08, 2016 10:48 pm
    Its the same guy in both calls, there were no weapons recovered from the scene. I'll chalk this one up to racist paranoia. Hopefully justice is served and this yahoo rots in jail.

  5. by avatar ShepherdsDog
    Mon Aug 08, 2016 11:15 pm
    Too late the yahoo has already been shot.

  6. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Mon Aug 08, 2016 11:30 pm
    "Delwin" said
    Its the same guy in both calls, there were no weapons recovered from the scene. I'll chalk this one up to racist paranoia. Hopefully justice is served and this yahoo rots in jail.


    Are you just hoping that it was or, do you have proof and the reason I ask is because the article said:

    About 7 minutes before that call about the shooting, another caller


    I'm pretty sure the term "another caller" normally means someone else.

  7. by avatar Delwin
    Mon Aug 08, 2016 11:38 pm
    The media was careful not to attribute the first call to him because he did not identify himself and wouldn't give his address in the first call. He likely did not make a statement on the advice of his attorney and rightfully so since the first call is a clear indication of his intention.

    However pay close attention to the second call, when his wife passes the phone to him he answers "Hello Again."

    These were the first 2 calls of 6 made. So why "Hello again" unless he was the unidentified caller from the first call?

    Also, he placed the first call, his wife placed the second making her the 2nd caller.

  8. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Tue Aug 09, 2016 12:00 am
    "Delwin" said
    The media was careful not to attribute the first call to him because he did not identify himself and wouldn't give his address in the first call. He likely did not make a statement on the advice of his attorney and rightfully so since the first call is a clear indication of his intention.

    However pay close attention to the second call, when his wife passes the phone to him he answers "Hello Again."

    These were the first 2 calls of 6 made. So why "Hello again" unless he was the unidentified caller from the first call?

    Also, he placed the first call, his wife placed the second making her the 2nd caller.


    Maybe but, "hello again" might not even be relevant to what happened. For all we know he could be one of those people who are continually phoning the police to complain about everything from kids on his lawns to police misconduct. Besides they keep referring to the first caller as the neighbourhood watch caller which means they must have some idea who it was especially given that all call numbers are recorded.

    Either way, if these guys were street racing there should be other witnesses so, it shouldn't be hard to find out if they were armed and what happened before the guy was shot who, was for some odd reason outside this guys garage.

  9. by avatar andyt
    Tue Aug 09, 2016 12:09 am
    About seven minutes later, an upset female caller gives the dispatcher an address that authorities would later identify as Copley’s house. The dispatcher asks what happened.

    “I don’t know. I’m upstairs with our children,” the female caller says.

    She then gives the phone to what sounds like the same male caller from earlier.


    https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2016 ... arage.html

  10. by avatar Delwin
    Tue Aug 09, 2016 12:10 am
    @FOG

    Well sure, he could have been saying hello again because the dispatcher used to be his 4th grade math teacher or any number of ridiculously unlikely scenarios. I was presenting the most likely scenario and based on the fact that first degree murder charges were brought against the man and he is being held without bond, I'd say the police have some degree of confidence in his culpability.

  11. by avatar andyt
    Tue Aug 09, 2016 1:52 am
    Let’s unpack all the ways Chad Cameron Copley (pictured above) screwed up, based on the evidence we know so far.

    The first is that he left the relative protection of his home to go into his garage confront a group in the darkness beyond. He put his life at risk, instead of doing the smart thing, which is to call 911 and let officers arriving at the scene handle the issue.

    But Copley didn’t do the smart thing.

    He went out and confronted the group and they started cursing at him.

    Copley then says, “they were showing a firearm.”

    He didn’t say they threatened him with it or brandished the weapon, and he didn’t consider it a deadly force threat. If he did, he would have fired at the man pointing the gun and would be at most facing a manslaughter charge.

    But Copley—clearly the 911 caller referenced in the story—didn’t claim that he was using his shotgun in lawful self-defense. Copley claims that he fired a “warning shot.”

    His “warning shot” struck and killed Kouren-Rodney Bernard Thomas.

    Copley appears to have indicted himself with 911 calls that were essentially a confession.

    You don’t tell the police that you are going to “secure your neighborhood” and then tell the dispatcher that they “better send police quickly” because you’re about to take the law into your own hands.

    You never fire a warning shot. Warning shots are illegal nearly everywhere. You’re either justified in firing a shot in self defense at a violent person, or you aren’t authorized in discharging a firearm at all.

    Chad Cameron Copley did not want to wait for law enforcement, took the law into his own hands, was ignorant of the applicable laws, and then discharged a weapon when he got over his head.

    Kouren-Rodney Bernard Thomas may have been a jerk taunting Copley. He may have been a spectator. He may have been some guy completely unaware of Copley who just happened to walk by when Copley levelled his shotgun and fired.

    All we know for sure is that Copley fired a shot that he did not need to fire, and Thomas is dead as a result.

    If you’re going to obtain a firearm, folks, you need to know more than just basic firearms safety and manipulation. You need to know explicitly how the laws of self-defense work in your state, and when you may lawfully use a firearm in self-defense.

    Quite frankly, if you own a firearm, haven’t been to a defensive firearms class (no a concealed carry certification class doesn’t count), and haven’t read Andrew Branca’s The Law of Self Defense*, then you’re setting yourself up to potentially be the next Chad Copley.


    http://bearingarms.com/bob-o/2016/08/08 ... ning-shot/


    If the above analysis is correct, it seems even in the US, some sanity prevails.

  12. by avatar Delwin
    Tue Aug 09, 2016 3:43 am
    Yeah, it's good to see that even on the right there are those who can call a spade a spade. This wasn't defence, he was on a seek and destroy mission.



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net