![]() Inmates break out of their cell to save their jailer's lifeUncle Sam | 206796 hits | Jul 12 5:54 pm | Posted by: shockedcanadian Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 2 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
|
God Bless America.
There have got to be a few. The US has the highest rate of incarceration in the entire world. God bless America indeed.
Not one America cop or citizen has interfered with my career, harassed me, threatened me or my wife. I can't say the same for some Canadians and the lemmings they recruit. Ironically, these violators of rights and basic premises are supposed to be the "good guys". Like f they are.
Yes, God Bless America.
No terrorist has done anything to me, they all must be good. Or I got into an argument with a Chinese guy over a parking spot, they all must be bad.
You should really consider a little more discretion in your judgement. It's what most people expect from everyone.
That's your yardstick, it hasn't happened to me so it must be good? I'd say if that is your only metric, you may in fact be the most prejudicial person alive.
No terrorist has done anything to me, they all must be good. Or I got into an argument with a Chinese guy over a parking spot, they all must be bad.
You should really consider a little more discretion in your judgement. It's what most people expect from everyone.
So you exercize discretion when judging terrorism?
Ironically, by definition, what we have experienced is a form of terrorism.
Those who a use their authority and have damaged Canadas reputation with our allies will be judged accordingly.
Funny that you think your paranoid delusion can be construed as terrorism.
Funny that you actually care.
I don't have a criminal record, do you?
I told successive Public Safety Ministers to send their surrogates to my home and arrest me, present me with charges, or leave me alone. That is how real democracies work. They think my home and retirement are going to be sacrificed for their sorry excuse for an agenda they have another thing coming.
When our allies and various forums learn the names and details of former CBC employees, current employees at Adidas, TD Bank (in management no less), and even one particular officer working at Amazon in Seattle, then I will accept being judged as "delusional". The days of my family suffering without the truth and details coming out are over. They can explain to America and our allies just how their intentions are different than their actions.
That's your yardstick, it hasn't happened to me so it must be good? I'd say if that is your only metric, you may in fact be the most prejudicial person alive.
No terrorist has done anything to me, they all must be good. Or I got into an argument with a Chinese guy over a parking spot, they all must be bad.
You should really consider a little more discretion in your judgement. It's what most people expect from everyone.
So you exercize discretion when judging terrorism?
Ironically, by definition, what we have experienced is a form of terrorism.
Those who a use their authority and have damaged Canadas reputation with our allies will be judged accordingly.Of course I do. Just because a terrorist has not done anything wrong to me, doesn't make them Ok, and just because an authority labels a person a terrorist doesn't make it so. (Nelson Mandela)
I judge the organization based on their actions and the individual based on their affiliation. In some cases, the individual acts outside of the scope of the mandate of the organization. If they are not acting in an official capacity as a member of the organization, then it is not fair to paint the entire organization with the same brush.
Eg Terrorists are bad, John is a terrorist, John is bad, is logical since both events must be true. However, John is a cop, John is bad, all cops are bad is illogical.
Members belonging to a set must contain the characteristics of that set. A set need not maintain the characteristics of each unique member.
This is systemic, and it represents both a domestic threat and a threat to America in particular. I don't have to do anything more than speak the truth, foreign governments and businesses can decide for themselves what's up. We do seem to have quite a high level of exported terrorism overseas. That in itself, should be cause for concern to our allies.
These aren't rogue agents. I initially confronted the Canadian government as I assumed they were rogue and falsely believed confronting them would force them to act ethically. A decade + later and three careers, I know the facts. So do many of our allies and multiple agencies in the U.S who deserved to know the facts. I'm no longer under the illusion that the province and State will heel.
This is systemic, and it represents both a domestic threat and a threat to America in particular. I don't have to do anything more than speak the truth, foreign governments and businesses can decide for themselves what's up. We do seem to have quite a high level of exported terrorism overseas. That in itself, should be cause for concern to our allies.
You are as nutty as a fruitcake thinking you are so important that businesses and government officials are targeting you.
These aren't rogue agents. I initially confronted the Canadian government as I assumed they were rogue and falsely believed confronting them would force them to act ethically. A decade + later and three careers, I know the facts. So do many of our allies and multiple agencies in the U.S who deserved to know the facts. I'm no longer under the illusion that the province and State will heel.
This is systemic, and it represents both a domestic threat and a threat to America in particular. I don't have to do anything more than speak the truth, foreign governments and businesses can decide for themselves what's up. We do seem to have quite a high level of exported terrorism overseas. That in itself, should be cause for concern to our allies.
You are as nutty as a fruitcake thinking you are so important that businesses and government officials are targeting you.
Businesses aren't targeting me, where did you get that idea?
When you hire undercover dirtbags and send them into companies, you better make sure they aren't spreading anti-semetism, anti-American hatred, and/or trying to create labour problems by generating interest in a union.
Oh, and if you engage in these tactics which cause the Canadian economy and it's citizens harm, don't get made when you do.
[quote="shlockedsquirrelshit in the midst of a psychotic break":2h18qhzw]These aren't rogue agents. I initially confronted the Canadian government as I assumed they were rogue and falsely believed confronting them would force them to act ethically. A decade + later and three careers, I know the facts. So do many of our allies and multiple agencies in the U.S who deserved to know the facts. I'm no longer under the illusion that the province and State will heel.
This is systemic, and it represents both a domestic threat and a threat to America in particular. I don't have to do anything more than speak the truth, foreign governments and businesses can decide for themselves what's up. We do seem to have quite a high level of exported terrorism overseas. That in itself, should be cause for concern to our allies.
You are as nutty as a fruitcake thinking you are so important that businesses and government officials are targeting you.
MHA is all that we need to know about him.
That's your yardstick, it hasn't happened to me so it must be good? I'd say if that is your only metric, you may in fact be the most prejudicial person alive.
No terrorist has done anything to me, they all must be good. Or I got into an argument with a Chinese guy over a parking spot, they all must be bad.
You should really consider a little more discretion in your judgement. It's what most people expect from everyone.
Americans don't have this skewed obligation to the Canadian security apparatus, their obligation is to the safety and security of their citizens and their interests. They won't erroneously defend Bob Paulson and his merry men or any other covert mechanism in Canada where it isn't warranted. They follow laws, and as we saw in Texas, they risk their lives and die to defend these laws.
Even more telling, the U.S government has experienced harassment and illegal activities against them. I am sure many of you read the recent release of information regarding what Russian police and security forces were doing to politicians, it made news on CNN, Fox and BBC, along with major newspapers in the U.S. One Russian agent caught hitting a U.S politician, others covertly entering their homes and even killing a family pet. Americans know what goes on and how dirty foreign agencies can be to U.S interests. Canada is not immune from engaging in these abuses, putting their own careers and agencies above country and law.
Bottom line, regardless of what you believe from me, you can agree on one fact: "if you are working for a Canadian agency, spreading hatred against the U.S, Israel or any other allied nation, radicalizing your own citizens and interfering in American corporations labour", you are in fact, not an ally. I am all ears if one of you can make an argument that somehow Canada is trustworthy under these circumstances.
If you agree on that premise, than I have done my job. If you deny the premise, than you had better have a good argument.