news Canadian News
Good Evening Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Morley Safer, 60 Minutes journalist, dead at 84

Canadian Content
20683news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Morley Safer, 60 Minutes journalist, dead at 84


Misc CDN | 206822 hits | May 19 11:30 am | Posted by: DrCaleb
7 Comment

Morley Safer, the legendary, Toronto-born reporter who covered such landmark stories as the construction of the Berlin Wall and the Vietnam War, has died at the age of 84, according to CBS News.

Comments

  1. by avatar Strutz
    Fri May 20, 2016 2:29 am
    He had quite the career. Incredible that he retired just last week, as though he knew it was time.

    RIP Morley.

  2. by housewife
    Fri May 20, 2016 2:45 am
    What a shock an amazing career.

    RIP

  3. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Fri May 20, 2016 4:29 pm
    "Strutz" said
    He had quite the career. Incredible that he retired just last week, as though he knew it was time.

    RIP Morley.


    He was probably dying from something and decided to just work right up to the end because that's what he loved the most was his work.

  4. by avatar andyt
    Fri May 20, 2016 4:31 pm
    Canadian too, eh. Apparently not too popular in the White House and Pentagon after his Vietnam reporting showing marines torching a village.


  5. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Fri May 20, 2016 4:47 pm
    "andyt" said
    Canadian too, eh. Apparently not too popular in the White House and Pentagon after his Vietnam reporting showing Marines torching villages.


    If the village provided support to the VC it got burned.

    In SWA if the village supported the Taliban then ground forces (and the embedded media) were pulled back to avoid the media painting the village as a bunch of poor victims and then the village would be reduced by artillery or airstrikes.

    These days the Obama Administration just uses drones so as to make sure there's nothing for the media to report.

  6. by avatar BeaverFever
    Fri May 20, 2016 6:23 pm
    "BartSimpson" said
    Canadian too, eh. Apparently not too popular in the White House and Pentagon after his Vietnam reporting showing Marines torching villages.


    If the village provided support to the VC it got burned.

    In SWA if the village supported the Taliban then ground forces (and the embedded media) were pulled back to avoid the media painting the village as a bunch of poor victims and then the village would be reduced by artillery or airstrikes.



    That was on odd-numbered days of the week. On even-numbered, days, a parade of soldiers and trailing media entourage would hand out food and candy and medical supplies to show they were "winning the hearts and minds" of locals.

    That said, I don't actually think any villages in Afghanistan were levelled simply because the Taliban used them...yes, they bombed Taliban fighters almost anywhere they found the fighters, often with civilian casualties...but I don't think they bombed a village full of civilians just because it was stashing food or supplies for the Taliban.

    Everyone knows the Taliban, like the NVA, Viet Cong, and most other guerilla armies, would force villages to store their supplies and there was little the villages could do about it. Americans in Vietnam didn't care about that, but we've evolved into intelligent beings since then. So the same policy wasn't followed in Afghanistan, even though US pilots and officers still have broad leeway to interpret the ROE as it pleases them and still kill way more friendlies and civilians than any other western nation.

  7. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Fri May 20, 2016 6:49 pm
    "BeaverFever" said

    That said, I don't actually think any villages in Afghanistan were levelled simply because the Taliban used them...yes, they bombed Taliban fighters almost anywhere they found the fighters, often with civilian casualties...but I don't think they bombed a village full of civilians just because it was stashing food or supplies for the Taliban.


    https://www.wired.com/2011/01/25-tons-o ... f-the-map/

    And Obama did that one with Secretary Clinton approving it. :idea:



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • Strutz Thu May 19, 2016 6:44 pm
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net