news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Officers 'savagely beat' suspect in drug arrest

Canadian Content
20779news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Officers 'savagely beat' suspect in drug arrest, former constable says


Law & Order | 207793 hits | Apr 28 6:03 am | Posted by: DrCaleb
11 Comment

A former Edmonton police officer testified Wednesday he witnessed three officers “savagely beat” a suspected drug trafficker.

Comments

  1. by avatar uwish
    Thu Apr 28, 2016 2:07 pm
    The sooner more cop shops adopt body cams the sooner this kind of shit goes away

  2. by shockedcanadian
    Thu Apr 28, 2016 2:52 pm
    Silly cop. He should have moved to Ontario or joined the RCMP, this wouldn't have been news (unless he killed the guy and was caught on video).

  3. by avatar andyt
    Thu Apr 28, 2016 3:02 pm
    Our allies will never trust us again.

  4. by avatar Delwin
    Thu Apr 28, 2016 3:03 pm
    Even if all forces adopt body cams, i doubt cops will wear them on sting operations just because it could comprimise their identity, so I think this stuff isnt going away anytime soon.

    They do have super small cameras but it is still a risk that someone notices.

    I saw an interesting article on the drop in crime rates in the US since the 80's and 90's and I feel strongly that the advent of camera phones, and cell phones in general are largely responsible for this. It is another dynamic that criminals have to work around when planning their crimes.

  5. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Thu Apr 28, 2016 3:11 pm
    Just a bunch of thugs who happen to wear badges. :|

  6. by shockedcanadian
    Thu Apr 28, 2016 3:11 pm
    "andyt" said
    Our allies will never trust us again.


    It's not those in uniform our allies don't trust...

  7. by avatar andyt
    Thu Apr 28, 2016 3:14 pm
    "Delwin" said
    Even if all forces adopt body cams, i doubt cops will wear them on sting operations just because it could comprimise their identity, so I think this stuff isnt going away anytime soon.

    They do have super small cameras but it is still a risk that someone notices.

    I saw an interesting article on the drop in crime rates in the US since the 80's and 90's and I feel strongly that the advent of camera phones, and cell phones in general are largely responsible for this. It is another dynamic that criminals have to work around when planning their crimes.


    I would guess only uniform cops will wear the cams. But that would already make a big diff. The majority of cases you hear about are uniform cops using excessive force. The people who really need to wear them are the jailers (in the holding cells). Probably use some excuse of privacy for prisoners not to wear them.

  8. by avatar Delwin
    Thu Apr 28, 2016 3:31 pm
    I agree, except i would argue for fixed cameras. The technology is so inexpensive, it wouldnt cost much and regardless of the crime, the state is still responsible for the safety of the prisoners. It would make it easier to monitor prisoners, prevent escapes, murders, suicides, assaults and rapes. Every inch of every prison should be recorded.

    Also every inmates would have a greater incentive to behave, which could have positive benifits.

  9. by avatar andyt
    Thu Apr 28, 2016 3:40 pm
    There was a fixed camera when that RCMP shot Ian Bush in the back of the head. Funny thing, the camera wasn't working. There was also a fixed camera when the cops were all watching the two drunken women going at it.

  10. by avatar Delwin
    Thu Apr 28, 2016 3:48 pm
    I read that now having all cameras turned on at all times is a requirement in that precinct. I suppose the best way to ensure its not ignored would be to share the stream with an advocacy group of some kind, but then youq get into privacy again. Safety trumps privacy though, IMO and you give it up when you commit the crime.

  11. by shockedcanadian
    Thu Apr 28, 2016 3:56 pm
    Make under covers wear cameras. You would have more uncovers in prison than actual perps they are going after. Not to mention many of our allies would probably recall their ministers...



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net