We all know science is a fantastic tool for explaining our world. But as medical doctor-turned-editor Ivan Oransky knows all too well, it's not perfect.
There's a website: Retraction Watch, or something. Will soon have a database of all retracted papers. Because the problem is that retracted papers continue to be cited in further studies, so bullshit based on bullshit. I think they also work to check for papers that should be retracted.
"andyt" said There's a website: Retraction Watch, or something. Will soon have a database of all retracted papers. Because the problem is that retracted papers continue to be cited in further studies, so bullshit based on bullshit. I think they also work to check for papers that should be retracted.
Think I heard this on the Ceeb.
And the guy in the article is the co-founder of "Retraction Watch".
Think I heard this on the Ceeb.
There's a website: Retraction Watch, or something. Will soon have a database of all retracted papers. Because the problem is that retracted papers continue to be cited in further studies, so bullshit based on bullshit. I think they also work to check for papers that should be retracted.
Think I heard this on the Ceeb.
And the guy in the article is the co-founder of "Retraction Watch".