news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Only 29% of Ontarians think Kathleen Wynne is d

Canadian Content
20790news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Only 29% of Ontarians think Kathleen Wynne is doing a good job: Poll


Provincial Politics | 207895 hits | Feb 22 1:11 pm | Posted by: N_Fiddledog
35 Comment

The majority of Ontarians disapprove of the way Premier Kathleen Wynne is doing her job, according to a Mainstreet Research/Postmedia poll.

Comments

  1. by avatar N_Fiddledog
    Mon Feb 22, 2016 9:19 pm
    I like Canada's best blogger's headline to this one.

    29% Of Ontario Residents Certifiably Insane

  2. by avatar 2Cdo
    Mon Feb 22, 2016 9:26 pm
    Still 30% fucking morons in Ontario.

  3. by avatar PluggyRug
    Mon Feb 22, 2016 10:02 pm
    The Canadian Gardening magazine suggests putting up a bat house to encourage the presence of these shy animals in your garden.

    Bats can consume 3,000 or more mosquitoes and other insects nightly, and bats are much less likely to be rabid than dogs are.

    Bats are also responsible for up to 95 percent of seed dispersal essential to the regeneration of forests. Our planet is populated with plenty of bizarre and astonishing bats.

    Here are three to watch for...


    Sucker Foot Bat

    sucker.jpg


    Red Wing Bat


    red wing.jpg

    Ding Bat


    Dingbat.jpg

    If we could just train her to eat mosquitoes...or do SOMETHING useful!

  4. by avatar ShepherdsDog
    Mon Feb 22, 2016 10:13 pm
    Her only comfort could be, at least she isn't Greg Selinger....not that it's any consolation.

  5. by Lemmy
    Mon Feb 22, 2016 11:03 pm
    “I find her numbers the most interesting — she has the highest plus-minus number — surprising in that she really hasn’t done much,” Maggi said. “It doesn’t seem to make sense but maybe doing nothing, you’re not alienating any voters ... and perhaps ‘silence is golden’ is appropriate for this particular scenario.”

    It makes sense if those who disapprove of her disapprove of her for things other than the job she's doing.

  6. by Thanos
    Mon Feb 22, 2016 11:31 pm
    BRAWNDO - The thirst annihilator. It's got electrolytes! Proudly sponsoring tonight's episode of OW! My Balls!

  7. by OnTheIce
    Tue Feb 23, 2016 2:53 am
    You can always count on Lemmy to jump in and deflect away from his pal Kathleen.

  8. by Lemmy
    Tue Feb 23, 2016 3:01 am
    Again, you mistake objectivity for support. You get a notion in your skull and just hang with it. Pretty sure I'm on the record supporting Hudak, aren't I? Said many times that civil service needs trimmed. 100,000 was sound policy. Shitting politicking, but sound policy. Pretty sure I ripped on Wynne for selling Hydro one, didn't I? What else has she done to have her numbers go from "majority" election win to this?

  9. by avatar BeaverFever
    Tue Feb 23, 2016 5:03 am
    "2Cdo" said
    Still 30% fucking morons in Ontario.



    Where'd you get the extra 1% from? Did you add in the people who voted Conservative in the last election?

    ROTFL

  10. by avatar PublicAnimalNo9
    Tue Feb 23, 2016 6:47 am
    "BeaverFever" said
    Still 30% fucking morons in Ontario.



    Where'd you get the extra 1% from? Did you add in the people who voted Conservative in the last election?

    ROTFL
    Nah, he just naturally assumed you voted for her twice.

  11. by avatar PublicAnimalNo9
    Tue Feb 23, 2016 6:51 am
    "Lemmy" said
    “I find her numbers the most interesting — she has the highest plus-minus number — surprising in that she really hasn’t done much,” Maggi said. “It doesn’t seem to make sense but maybe doing nothing, you’re not alienating any voters ... and perhaps ‘silence is golden’ is appropriate for this particular scenario.”

    It makes sense if those who disapprove of her disapprove of her for things other than the job she's doing.

    Like what?

  12. by OnTheIce
    Tue Feb 23, 2016 12:46 pm
    "Lemmy" said
    Again, you mistake objectivity for support. You get a notion in your skull and just hang with it. Pretty sure I'm on the record supporting Hudak, aren't I? Said many times that civil service needs trimmed. 100,000 was sound policy. Shitting politicking, but sound policy. Pretty sure I ripped on Wynne for selling Hydro one, didn't I? What else has she done to have her numbers go from "majority" election win to this?


    Objectivity?

    More like 'Positivity'.

    How many times have you come to the defence of our Provincial government with your "its not so bad" mantra?

  13. by Lemmy
    Tue Feb 23, 2016 1:41 pm
    "PublicAnimalNo9" said
    It makes sense if those who disapprove of her disapprove of her for things other than the job she's doing.

    Like what?
    Well if she hasn't done anything, in terms of policy or government action, to have earned such low public opinion, that low public opinion must be the result of something else, mustn't it? If they say "I think she's doing a bad job because she's been in office a year and hasn't done anything yet", fair enough. Is that what they're saying though?

    "OnTheIce" said
    How many times have you come to the defence of our Provincial government with your "its not so bad" mantra?

    I don't know. That would depend on how many times you and others have exaggerated something out of political spite, instead of sticking to facts. See, that's the mistake you make over and over and over and over again. When I call out someone's exaggerations, that is not defence of anyone. It's defence of fact. It's separating fact from rhetoric. When I call out your anti-Liberal rhetoric, that doesn't imply that I support of the Liberals. Usually I don't support them. What I support are facts and objectivity, which is a world your type isn't familiar with.

  14. by OnTheIce
    Tue Feb 23, 2016 2:08 pm
    "Lemmy" said

    I don't know. That would depend on how many times you and others have exaggerated something out of political spite, instead of sticking to facts. See, that's the mistake you make over and over and over and over again. When I call out someone's exaggerations, that is not defence of anyone. It's defence of fact. It's separating fact from rhetoric. When I call out your anti-Liberal rhetoric, that doesn't imply that I support of the Liberals. Usually I don't support them. What I support are facts and objectivity, which is a world your type isn't familiar with.


    When you opt to ignore the record of the current Liberals and Kathleen Wynne, as you have done above with your suggestion that they haven't done anything in the last year, and brush off criticism of the government based on facts and not rhetoric, you're either blind to what's taking place or you support the Liberals.

    When you ignore the obvious like the sale of Hydro One, the pending ORPP, staggering debt/deficit and the current OPP charges in Sudbury to suggest she's done nothing is just turning a blind eye or ignorance.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2 3

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net