![]() Residents at Toronto hotel say they're being booted for Syrian refugeesMisc CDN | 207664 hits | Jan 27 9:03 am | Posted by: N_Fiddledog Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Who voted on this?
|
The ''humanitarian superpower'' that lets its own people freeze to death
http://speisa.com/modules/articles/inde ... death.html
Sounds like they are making citizens homeless so the refugees will have a place to stay.
Yes, that exactly.
And it will continue, and grow.
More likely the Hotel owners will be getting more money from the Govt to house refugees than with their current residents so they are kicking out the current residents without the government realizing it.
Almost entirely likely what's happening. Hopefully this attention to it brings about a more viable solution.
For the Syrian mother, the isolation is taking a toll.
"I feel even though we chose to come out to Canada and it was something that we chose to do, it was our right and we chose it, however, it's not what we expected and it's not what we thought we would come into," said Abu-Rukti.
"Maybe this isn't where I should be. Another lady asked to return and the Canadian Embassy said: 'There is no way you guys can return now.'"
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/p ... -1.3418220
So there you have it.
The new life in Trutopia. So bad Syrian refugees want to go home.
And apparently Canadian welfare moms have it so bad they want them to, so they can get back what the Syrians want to leave.
That's another good reason not to vote anymore. The first is you can't get blamed when things go wrong because you're not responsible at all for putting the morons in control. The second one is that if you don't vote you don't have to associate with stupid people anymore. A third one would be that 999990 times out of 1000000 your single vote means absolutely nothing at all and doesn't change the course of events in the slightest, but we should probably save the conversation of how your vote means statistically less than your odds of winning the lottery for later.
At this stage the smart thing to do would be to buy into an apartment building and kick all the tenants out. There appears to be some pretty good profit in leasing out to the government to provide lodgings for some rapefugees and I doubt anyone ever went broke when they got into slumlording. What happens to the former tenants isn't anyone's problem either because, y'know, free market, responsibility to shareholders, and all that other crap.