 Liberals back away from vow to keep annual deficits under $10B | CTV News The finance minister is highlighting three economic priorities for the new government -- but the Liberal campaign vow to cap annual deficits at $10 billion is apparently no longer among them.Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 2 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
here's something for the middle class to prepare them for what's coming, although I don't think there'll be much pleasure involved.
That won't be enough, by a long shot.
Justine will try to catch up to Obongo levels of spending.
Justine will try to catch up to Obongo levels of spending.
Again with the Justine. What is your guys' problem with women anyway?
2nd broken promise in the first month. Is anyone surprised?
What was the first?
2nd broken promise in the first month. Is anyone surprised?
What was the first?
No gov't nannies for millionaires.
You could also throw in 25k migrants by Christmas, but I won't hold him down for that.
2nd broken promise in the first month. Is anyone surprised?
What was the first?
25,000 refugees by the end of 2015.
No gov't nannies for millionaires.
Uh no, there is no campaign promise called that.
He promised that families earning more than $200,000 per year would not be eligible for a taxpayer-funded government cash handout. The handout is what Tories had dubbed "Universal Child Care Benefit" and claimed it was for childcare but since it's just a cheque in the mail with no strings attached, it can be spent on anything that suits your fancy from nannies to beer and popcorn to strippers and hookers.
That promise has not been broken.
No gov't nannies for millionaires.
Uh no, there is no campaign promise called that.
He promised that families earning more than $200,000 per year would not be eligible for a taxpayer-funded government cash handout. The handout is what Tories had dubbed "Universal Child Care Benefit" and claimed it was for childcare but since it's just a cheque in the mail with no strings attached, it can be spent on anything that suits your fancy from nannies to beer and popcorn to strippers and hookers.
That promise has not been broken.
Good job at splitting the hairs !
Says on the campaign, rich people (including himself, specifically) shouldn't get
the Credit.
Backdates payment for 2 nannies on the gov't dime immediately after taking office.
Shows the spending patterns for the future, today is just another example.
No gov't nannies for millionaires.
Uh no, there is no campaign promise called that.
He promised that families earning more than $200,000 per year would not be eligible for a taxpayer-funded government cash handout. The handout is what Tories had dubbed "Universal Child Care Benefit" and claimed it was for childcare but since it's just a cheque in the mail with no strings attached, it can be spent on anything that suits your fancy from nannies to beer and popcorn to strippers and hookers.
That promise has not been broken.
Good job at splitting the hairs !
Says on the campaign, rich people (including himself, specifically) shouldn't get
the Credit.
Backdates payment for 2 nannies on the gov't dime immediately after taking office.
Shows the spending patterns for the future, today is just another example.
I don't agree. That has nothing to do with the promise made.
As mentioned in previous topics, our leaders having staff to work around him is par for the course. Are the optics bad? Sure. But it's not out of line.
http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comme ... ers-france
Canada (383) has sent more people to Paris than Australia (46), the U.K. (96), the U.S. (148), Russia (313) and almost as many as host-country France (396).
Not a bad turnout for a country that emits just 1.6 per cent of the planet’s greenhouse gases, eh?
Or maybe it’s not something to admire when you consider how much polluting fossil fuel was burned to fly so many hundreds of people across the ocean to talk about burning less.
Looking down the list of Canada’s participants in Paris, it’s hard not to conclude we’re vastly over-represented.
Did we really need to send the deputy environment minister for the Northwest Territories? The climate-change youth ambassador for the Yukon? The leader of the New Brunswick Green Party? The interim leader of the Bloc Quebecois and his press secretary? The “security co-ordinator” for Hydro-Quebec?
Seriously, how much is THAT going to cost ?
Oink oink, Liberals are back in town !
Hope Costco stocks family sized lube.
It also matches up with this kind of story:
http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comme ... ers-france
Canada (383) has sent more people to Paris than Australia (46), the U.K. (96), the U.S. (148), Russia (313) and almost as many as host-country France (396).
Not a bad turnout for a country that emits just 1.6 per cent of the planet’s greenhouse gases, eh?
Or maybe it’s not something to admire when you consider how much polluting fossil fuel was burned to fly so many hundreds of people across the ocean to talk about burning less.
Looking down the list of Canada’s participants in Paris, it’s hard not to conclude we’re vastly over-represented.
Did we really need to send the deputy environment minister for the Northwest Territories? The climate-change youth ambassador for the Yukon? The leader of the New Brunswick Green Party? The interim leader of the Bloc Quebecois and his press secretary? The “security co-ordinator” for Hydro-Quebec?
Seriously, how much is THAT going to cost ?
Oink oink, Liberals are back in town !
Hope Costco stocks family sized lube.
Well you just can't take good selfies with the same people over and over.
Good job at splitting the hairs !
Says on the campaign, rich people (including himself, specifically) shouldn't get
the Credit.
Backdates payment for 2 nannies on the gov't dime immediately after taking office.
Shows the spending patterns for the future, today is just another example.
That's hardly splitting hairs. You must be too old to remember what a hair is.
Including the Nannies, Trudeau has exactly the same number of household staff that Harper did, which is 6. The PM's family gets to pick their staff for whatever needs that particular family feels they have. Trudeau's family chooses to have those staff perform nanny duties.
None of that has anything to do with cancelling a cash-back program for wealthy families.