![]() Clinton emails reveal deep rift between Harper, Canada’s foreign servicePolitical | 206756 hits | Dec 01 8:50 am | Posted by: BeaverFever Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
|
I know someone who's not getting an Icebreaker named after them!
This is my favorite of the emails
LMAO that is hilarious! Definitely Proof that she has "executive experience"!
It isn't the place of the bureaucrats to decide what they will do or not do because they think their opinion is more valid than the sitting governments. This is one of the reasons for the rift, Harper for all his faults, didn't like the way some things were being run and changed them. Much to the horror of the pigs at the trough. Well, tough shit.
Well it shows what an unpopular leader he was, and while it's his prerogative to implement whatever ideology he wants, it shows how divorced that ideology was from the professional experts.
Being a leader isn't a fuckin' popularity contest.
Yes, because it's all about being popular.
Being a leader isn't a fuckin' popularity contest.
You're right, it isn't.
But, being a politician is.
Which is, in my humble opinion, why our 'leaders' routinely fail us.
Yes, because it's all about being popular.
Being a leader isn't a fuckin' popularity contest.
It is and it isn't. You can't be popular all the time, but if you're actively disliked by the people you're supposed to be leading to the point where they feel they have to undermine you despite their own risk, then you're not much of a leader.
It is and it isn't. You can't be popular all the time, but if you're actively disliked by the people you're supposed to be leading to the point where they feel they have to undermine you despite their own risk, then you're not much of a leader.
Perhaps those that undermine their leaders are the problem, not the leaders themselves.
You cannot always assume that when subordinates turn on their leaders is due to a lack of leadership.
One insubordinate is a discipline problem. Large numbers of insubordinates is a leadership problem.
If that's the case, Ontario has a serious leadership problem.
I'm surprised you don't speak more about that considering your level of concern for leadership that you've demonstrated in this post.