Pakistan Suspends Deal to Accept European DeportationsWorld | 206787 hits | Nov 20 12:20 am | Posted by: N_Fiddledog  EU nations signed a deal with Pakistan in 2009 allowing them to repatriate illegal immigrants and other nationalities who transited through Pakistan on their way to Europe.Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
You going believe that left wing rag.
How's about this one then.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/11/ ... S220151118
Not even coffee time and you look like an idiot already.
You going believe that left wing rag.
How's about this one then.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/11/ ... S220151118
Not even coffee time and you look like an idiot already.
Whoosh. Have your coffee.
Just because we're stupid enough to allow the liberals to import these bastards doesn't mean Pakistan has to clean up our mess.
Not sure what the "liberals" have to do with any of this, but what's more dangerous: 1. bringing in 25,000 Syrian refugees, en masse, who are going to be scrutinized; or 2. allowing the 80-90,000 travellers who come to Canada daily, as tourists with virtually no screening whatsoever? (that number, btw, is over 1M per day to the USA).
Just because we're stupid enough to allow the liberals to import these bastards doesn't mean Pakistan has to clean up our mess.
Not sure what the "liberals" have to do with any of this, but what's more dangerous: 1. bringing in 25,000 Syrian refugees, en masse, who are going to be scrutinized; or 2. allowing the 80-90,000 travellers who come to Canada daily, as tourists with virtually no screening whatsoever? (that number, btw, is over 1M per day to the USA).
Well, if he means the Liberal party, I think I get it.
The previous party proposed a gradual process and a serious vetting. They were going to concentrate on the actual victims of organizations like say, the Islamic State. That would mean people like Christians, Yazidis, Druze first. The ones who are not just victims of say the state, but are also victims in the refugee camps.
Now the leader of the Liberal party used to campaign in radical mosques, so I think we can guess who he's likely to prioritize. And he is or at least was talking about jamming in 25,000 before Christmas. I don't care what him or Liberal puppets say, vetting is not possible in that time frame.
Now as to letting in tourists. I'm not against being careful there too. With airports, for example I prefer Israeli style profiling to Obama-style, TSA, joke security.
Pakistan is the most dangerous country in the world and has enough on it's plate.
Actually, I think Honduras still holds that title.
Pakistan is the most dangerous country in the world and has enough on it's plate.
Actually, I think Honduras still holds that title.
Actually it's your Presidents pet middle eastern project, Syria.
http://www.atlasandboots.com/most-dange ... ld-ranked/
Pakistan is the most dangerous country in the world and has enough on it's plate.
Actually, I think Honduras still holds that title.
Pakistan is the most dangerous country is the World because Jihadists are literally an Iranian revolution away from gaining access to nuclear weapons.
Pakistan is the most dangerous country in the world and has enough on it's plate.
Actually, I think Honduras still holds that title.
Pakistan is the most dangerous country is the World because Jihadists are literally an Iranian revolution away from gaining access to nuclear weapons.
But Iran would be closing in on them for the title.