Link Related to Canada in some say

Animal killer Kayla Bourque to live in New Westminster, warn police


Law & Order | 207501 hits | Sep 25 7:35 pm | Posted by: Hyack
11 Comment

A public notification has been issued for a woman convicted of causing unnecessary pain and suffering to an animal.

Comments

  1. by avatar N_Fiddledog
    Sat Sep 26, 2015 6:11 am
    We'll be hearing from her again.

    And apparently, courtesy of the judge, it will be sometime soon.

  2. by avatar Strutz
    Sat Sep 26, 2015 6:38 am
    Oh yeah... I remember her.

    You are probably right, I'm sure we will. Hopefully it won't be at the cost of a life.

  3. by avatar Hyack
    Sat Sep 26, 2015 5:15 pm
    Bourque was initially arrested under the Mental Health Act. A search of her residence turned up a blue nylon bag with a kitchen knife, a razor blade, three large garbage bags and a hypodermic needle; a mask was found nearby.

    Police also found video clips depicting her killing and hanging the family dog.

    In a search warrant for her premises obtained by CBC News, investigators alleged:

    Bourque had thoughts of killing a drunk SFU roommate, but decided there'd be too much evidence.
    Bourque wanted to get a gun and shoot homeless people.
    Bourque persuaded a suicidal boy, online, to kill himself.
    Bourque fantasized about killing someone during a home invasion.

    Bourque's family told CBC they believed she was ready to take the next step and start killing humans.


    Oh well, I guess she'll fit in quite well with some of the many low-lifes already residing here in beautiful New West!!

  4. by avatar andyt
    Sat Sep 26, 2015 5:25 pm
    Yes, it's too bad we can't just lock up people for what they might do.

  5. by avatar Hyack
    Sat Sep 26, 2015 5:35 pm
    "andyt" said
    Yes, it's too bad we can't just lock up people for what they might do.


    You really do have a twisted view of Canada's judicial system don't you. This is the 21st century you're living in andy, not the Dark Ages where such actions were common place.

  6. by avatar andyt
    Sat Sep 26, 2015 5:37 pm
    Oh!

  7. by avatar N_Fiddledog
    Sat Sep 26, 2015 5:54 pm
    I don't know about the label, but if we need one I'd "Minority Report" that particular bitch stat. If it were up to me, I mean.

    She'd at least be sent to a mental facility and wouldn't get out until she agreed to stop being nuts. I wouldn't care if that meant never.

  8. by avatar andyt
    Sat Sep 26, 2015 5:56 pm
    Back to the dark ages for you?

  9. by avatar N_Fiddledog
    Sat Sep 26, 2015 5:58 pm
    No. Minority Report takes place in the future. If you need a label, I mean.

  10. by avatar andyt
    Sat Sep 26, 2015 6:01 pm
    Sure. But it would be a regression to the dark ages, according to Hyack. And I agree. But then that's what the reactionaries want anyway. Including forelock tugging to the lord and middle ages income inequality, environmental standards, truthiness of church doctrine rather than science...the list goes on.

  11. by avatar N_Fiddledog
    Sat Sep 26, 2015 6:07 pm
    "andyt" said
    Sure. But it would be a regression to the dark ages, according to Hyack. And I agree. But then that's what the reactionaries want anyway. Including forelock tugging to the lord and middle ages income inequality, environmental standards, truthiness of church doctrine rather than science...the list goes on.


    So, you mean, you agree, then?

    That's fine. I disagree. I'd Minority Report the bitch.

    Except she could just go to the nut farm (possibly forever). It wouldn't be necessary to have Tom Cruise give her two in the back of the head.

    Yeah, I know. Call me a softy.



view comments in forum
You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile