news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Security expert says he hacked into aircraft co

Canadian Content
20691news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Security expert says he hacked into aircraft controls through entertainment system


Tech | 206914 hits | May 19 7:17 am | Posted by: DrCaleb
9 Comment

A security researcher told federal agents he was able to hack into aircraft computer systems mid-flight numerous times through the in-flight entertainment systems and was able to make the plane move sideways, according to an FBI agent's affidavit.

Comments

  1. by avatar DrCaleb
    Tue May 19, 2015 2:19 pm
    Something about this story is fishy. The manufacturer says it's impossible because the systems are not connected. And if he actually did it, as the FBI states - why is he not under arrest?

  2. by Regina  Gold Member
    Tue May 19, 2015 2:55 pm
    The entertainment system is usually Satellite TV and although it can give you a position on a map, it is not one of the multiple GPS sensors and displays used to navigate. I think this guy is just throwing shit on the wall to see what will stick, especially his name.

  3. by Lemmy
    Tue May 19, 2015 3:01 pm
    BACKFIRE! Scheme to drum up "security expert" business for himself exposes the fact he is not an expert at all. Ooops.

  4. by avatar andyt
    Tue May 19, 2015 3:24 pm
    "DrCaleb" said
    Something about this story is fishy. The manufacturer says it's impossible because the systems are not connected. And if he actually did it, as the FBI states - why is he not under arrest?


    This was my first thought too. Why would anybody connect the flight control and entertainment systems? What would be the point of that?

  5. by avatar DrCaleb
    Tue May 19, 2015 4:24 pm
    "andyt" said
    Something about this story is fishy. The manufacturer says it's impossible because the systems are not connected. And if he actually did it, as the FBI states - why is he not under arrest?


    This was my first thought too. Why would anybody connect the flight control and entertainment systems? What would be the point of that?

    Only to save money on wiring independent data carriers for each system. Otherwise, they should be 'airgapped'.

  6. by avatar andyt
    Tue May 19, 2015 4:28 pm
    We've had hacking for long enough now, you'd think that manufacturers would isolate sensitive systems, and that customers would insist on it.

  7. by avatar DrCaleb
    Tue May 19, 2015 5:31 pm
    "andyt" said
    We've had hacking for long enough now, you'd think that manufacturers would isolate sensitive systems, and that customers would insist on it.


    That's one of the things that's fishy. The manufacturers said they did. The Hacker says he broke through and gained control of the plane. One of them is lying.

  8. by avatar BeaverFever
    Tue May 19, 2015 5:58 pm
    I call BS on the whole thing. It doesn't sound even remotely feasible and even if it were true, the guy would certainly be behind bars.

  9. by avatar PluggyRug
    Tue May 19, 2015 6:34 pm
    "BeaverFever" said
    I call BS on the whole thing. It doesn't sound even remotely feasible and even if it were true, the guy would certainly be behind bars.


    I would agree.

    The radio control system I use for my aircraft uses FHSS (frequency hopping spread spectrum) for communication. The original (data) signal is spread by modulating it with a 32 bit PRN (pseudo random number) which only the transmitter and receiver know. This gives a possible use of up to 4 billion separate TX/RX combinations. which will not interfere with each other.
    This type of transmission is currently in use by the military.
    I don't know if commercial aircraft use this method. it would be a good idea.

  10. by avatar DrCaleb
    Tue May 19, 2015 6:48 pm
    "BeaverFever" said
    I call BS on the whole thing. It doesn't sound even remotely feasible and even if it were true, the guy would certainly be behind bars.


    And if he can, why aren't the manufacturers behind bars?



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net