news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Mulcair Promises Proportional Representation If

Canadian Content
20709news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Mulcair Promises Proportional Representation If NDP Wins Next Election


Political | 207089 hits | Apr 06 8:42 am | Posted by: ShepherdsDog
17 Comment

If the NDP forms Canada's next government, Thomas Mulcair says he'll put an end to majority governments elected by a minority of the population. In an op-ed published in Common Ground magazine this week, Mulcair promises that if the NDP has its wa...

Comments

  1. by avatar ShepherdsDog
    Mon Apr 06, 2015 3:47 pm
    Obviously he never wants to be PM....this system is horrible. It'll be coalition after coalition government with fringe parties being king makers. Look at Israel and Italy.

  2. by avatar PublicAnimalNo9
    Mon Apr 06, 2015 3:52 pm
    Funny how when Chretien won his second majority with only of the vote, no one cried and bitched about it.

  3. by OnTheIce
    Mon Apr 06, 2015 3:53 pm
    NDP will end up back in 3rd place where they belong. His promises carry no weight.

  4. by avatar andyt
    Mon Apr 06, 2015 3:54 pm
    "PublicAnimalNo9" said
    Funny how when Chretien won his second majority with only of the vote, no one cried and bitched about it.


    Or how people's memory fade over time.

    Australia has a partial prop rep system that seems to work very well. For the lower house you list your candidates in order of preference.
    If any candidate gets 50% of the primary vote (the number of boxes marked 1) plus one, he or she is elected.

    If not, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated and the other preferences on his or her ballot papers are redistributed to the other candidates. This continues until one candidate has 50% plus one, at which point he or she is elected for that seat.
    BC was flirting with a similar system, but it got rejected in a referendum. The system sounds pretty good to me.

    The Aussies also elect their senate. You can either just vote for a party, or the same STV system as the lower house.

    This certainly doesn't seem to have led to minority parliaments or coalitions. And they seem to have figured out their senate problem without causing gridlock.

  5. by Thanos
    Mon Apr 06, 2015 4:07 pm
    "OnTheIce" said
    NDP will end up back in 3rd place where they belong. His promises carry no weight.



    That the thing right there. All the Dippers are doing is trying to cover their bases and maintain some relevancy because they know that the Liberals are going to clean their clocks in most of the Ontario ridings, and a lot of the Quebec ones too, that the Dippers got in the last election. Spouting a bunch of pro-PR nonsense is just them stunting as usual in order to shore up as much of the puny and essentially irrelevant freak demographics that they get too much of their support from.

  6. by avatar Public_Domain
    Mon Apr 06, 2015 4:14 pm
    :|

  7. by avatar martin14
    Mon Apr 06, 2015 5:15 pm
    "ShepherdsDog" said
    Obviously he never wants to be PM....this system is horrible. It'll be coalition after coalition government with fringe parties being king makers. Look at Israel and Italy.



    No shit.


    Good to see he has already conceded the election, even before it got started.


    While he is at it, why doesn't the beard just go full stupid and offer

    every voter a million dollars if he wins the election.



    That should get him a few votes. :lol:

  8. by avatar ShepherdsDog
    Mon Apr 06, 2015 5:23 pm
    The aura of Happy Jack is gone

  9. by avatar PublicAnimalNo9
    Mon Apr 06, 2015 5:27 pm
    "andyt" said
    Funny how when Chretien won his second majority with only of the vote, no one cried and bitched about it.


    Or how people's memory fade over time.

    Yeah, and watch how selectively their memories will "fade" again when the next federal left-wing govt wins a majority with substantially less than 50% of the vote.

  10. by avatar BeaverFever
    Mon Apr 06, 2015 6:16 pm

    Funny how when Chretien won his second majority with only 38% of the vote, no one cried and bitched about it.

    Nobody on the left you mean. That's all we heard from the right until Harper came to power.

    That said, Shep is right. Proportional Representation will be an unaccountable mess where fringe groups wield ridiculously disproportionate power and policy will be made through closed-door backroom deals.

  11. by avatar bootlegga
    Mon Apr 06, 2015 9:07 pm
    While I don't like or trust Mulcair, I do think that PR should be adopted - it doesn't have to be a hodgepodge like Italy or Israel, but rather more like Australia or the STV system proposed in BC (larger riding with two reps). A system like that would be much more representative than the current one and avoid the coalition BS other countries have.

    I'd say that FPTP is a source of some voter apathy, simply because people in ridings all over the country feel, "Why bother voting, so-so and so is just going to get in anyways." And for conservatives living in large urban centres or liberals/dippers living in rural areas, it often is the case.

  12. by avatar ShepherdsDog
    Mon Apr 06, 2015 9:44 pm

    the STV system proposed in BC (larger riding with two reps).

    The system that BC voters rejected

  13. by avatar andyt
    Tue Apr 07, 2015 12:16 am
    BC voters also rejected the HST and voted in Christie Clark.

  14. by avatar Jabberwalker
    Tue Apr 07, 2015 12:22 am
    It's going to be a bitch to bring in proportional representation due to our very spread out geography ... that is if we continue to elect representatives to be (supposedly) our local voices, thinly populated places like the Yukon, PEI will have a much smaller voice and populous places like Southern Ontario will completely run things without hope of input from anywhere else.

    Most of you are in the West. I'm in Southern Ontario and vote-for-vote, I get less representation that any of you do but it's the only way to have a truly national government.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net