"martin14" said Andy, prepare your deflections right away !
I like the one that type does where because you notice the terror related arrest involves a follower of Mo, then in their version of reality that means you are saying only Muslims can be terrorists and all Muslims are necessarily terrorists.
Fantasy thinking - they want to believe a thing. It's convenient to their world view. That makes it factual.
On the other hand even those of us who rely on facts must admit...when there is a news story that says "terror related arrest", if you had to bet on who's involved, there is only one answer that is most likely to make you rich?
Just over a year after he arrived, he was arrested for fraud, possession of credit card data and using fraudulent credit cards to obtain goods. He received a conditional discharge and a 12 month probation order.
Despite the arrest, he was accepted as landed immigrant on Feb. 23, 2009 after his wife sponsored him. But on April 22, 2012, he was arrested again, this time for two counts of assault and uttering threats. He was arrested a third time on June 12, for failing to stay at least 500 metres away from his wife.
Why was he allowed in in the first place?
And:
Anser Farooq, his lawyer, said if Mr. Malik had done what the authorities have alleged, he should be charged, not sent back to Pakistan. “Why wouldn’t you prosecute this guy and give him life? I don’t think this is the right way to do it.”
Security expert Michel Juneau-Katsuya, a former CSIS agent, told CBC News Network the government is likely moving to deport him to avoid a criminal trial, which could take years and cost the government millions.
"They want to try and avoid that lengthy exercise, and simply send him to Pakistan, hoping that he will be arrested immediately and also prosecuted."
"This is a little bit strange," said Juneau-Katsuya. "We have him, we should be able to deal with this guy."
"I do not necessarily have the greatest confidence that in Pakistan, this will be treated like it should."
Lorne Waldman, a defence lawyer who has handled national security cases, said the standard of proof and rules of evidence in immigration proceedings are much lower than in criminal court.
"It's safe to say that if they had enough evidence to charge, they would do so," Waldman said.
"The only reasonable conclusion to draw is that the evidence is not evidence that could be admitted in a criminal trial, and it is not strong enough to meet the higher burden of proof."
Andy, prepare your deflections right away !
Deny, not real Muslims, not even a Muslim, it's all made up by liars who are white, refuse to respond.
There I just helped him get his notes together.
Must be one of those infamous Pakistani Lutherans. Maybe even a Baptist!
In any case it has nothing to do with Islam, which is a religion of peace.
Andy, prepare your deflections right away !
I like the one that type does where because you notice the terror related arrest involves a follower of Mo, then in their version of reality that means you are saying only Muslims can be terrorists and all Muslims are necessarily terrorists.
Fantasy thinking - they want to believe a thing. It's convenient to their world view. That makes it factual.
On the other hand even those of us who rely on facts must admit...when there is a news story that says "terror related arrest", if you had to bet on who's involved, there is only one answer that is most likely to make you rich?
Andy's seniors residence lost Internet today, it seems.
Maybe he's getting some OT from the Timmies.
Despite the arrest, he was accepted as landed immigrant on Feb. 23, 2009 after his wife sponsored him. But on April 22, 2012, he was arrested again, this time for two counts of assault and uttering threats. He was arrested a third time on June 12, for failing to stay at least 500 metres away from his wife.
Why was he allowed in in the first place?
And:
http://www.canadaka.net/link.php?id=89610
"They want to try and avoid that lengthy exercise, and simply send him to Pakistan, hoping that he will be arrested immediately and also prosecuted."
"This is a little bit strange," said Juneau-Katsuya. "We have him, we should be able to deal with this guy."
"I do not necessarily have the greatest confidence that in Pakistan, this will be treated like it should."
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/j ... -1.2990424
Shows the laws in place work, doesn't it?
No no no! They need the ability to gather and analyze all our data from all government departments in order to be able to catch these people.
Tow the line here!
"It's safe to say that if they had enough evidence to charge, they would do so," Waldman said.
"The only reasonable conclusion to draw is that the evidence is not evidence that could be admitted in a criminal trial, and it is not strong enough to meet the higher burden of proof."
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/m ... -1.2993181
Guy should have been kicked out long ago when he was convicted of crimes. But this just more politics of fear stuff, gvot trying to look tough.