news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Site C dam approved by B.C. government

Canadian Content
20692news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Site C dam approved by B.C. government


Environmental | 206913 hits | Dec 17 6:38 am | Posted by: DrCaleb
25 Comment

B.C. has approved the $9-billion Site C dam — a massive hydroelectric project that would flood a large area of the Peace River Valley in northeastern B.C.

Comments

  1. by avatar wildrosegirl
    Wed Dec 17, 2014 3:52 pm
    In making the announcement, Premier Christy Clark said the Site C Clean Energy Project will provide B.C. residents with a reliable source of power for the next 100 years for the least cost to the taxpayer.

    I hope that's the biggest lie I have to listen to today!
    BC isn't out of power. It's friggin California sucking it back, and it's the BC tax payers that foot the bill at $12+/unit, while the power suckers pay their locked in $4/unit.
    And, it isn't just the natives opposed to Site C. VERY few people in the north peace aren't opposed.
    Love the way they put the bullshit spin on this project.

  2. by avatar andyt
    Wed Dec 17, 2014 3:58 pm
    BC boomed by building 2 dams on the Peace. Seems reasonable to expect that this dam too will Provide us with cheap energy and be good for our economy. Of course bulk buyers are going to pay a different rate than individual homes. Seems BC actually got spanked for overcharging California and had to pay 750 million to settle the suit.

    Although I've read arguments that using natural gas for power generation with much lower up front investment and probably more flexibility too.

  3. by avatar DrCaleb
    Wed Dec 17, 2014 4:01 pm
    "wildrosegirl" said
    In making the announcement, Premier Christy Clark said the Site C Clean Energy Project will provide B.C. residents with a reliable source of power for the next 100 years for the least cost to the taxpayer.

    I hope that's the biggest lie I have to listen to today!
    BC isn't out of power. It's friggin California sucking it back, and it's the BC tax payers that foot the bill at $12+/unit, while the power suckers pay their locked in $4/unit.
    And, it isn't just the natives opposed to Site C. VERY few people in the north peace aren't opposed.
    Love the way they put the bullshit spin on this project.


    ^^ That.

    It's fine if BC wants to sell cheap power southward, so long as it's 'clean power'. But 'dirty oil', well, they'll be having none of that!

  4. by avatar wildrosegirl
    Wed Dec 17, 2014 4:05 pm
    "andyt" said
    BC boomed by building 2 dams on the Peace. Seems reasonable to expect that this dam too will Provide us with cheap energy and be good for our economy. Of course bulk buyers are going to pay a different rate than individual homes. Seems BC actually got spanked for overcharging California and had to pay 750 million to settle the suit.

    Dig into the real story on that one.

    California agreed to the "going rate" and then sued after they realized that was more than they had their customers locked into. When BC went to cut off California for nonpayment after the first 6 months, Duke Energy (check out who owns that) suddenly bought out the transmission line system. THEN they issued the "spanking" and BC residents' bills tripled within two billing periods to cover California's bill.
    We went from $4 to $12 in two months. Horseshit is what the whole deal is.

  5. by avatar wildrosegirl
    Wed Dec 17, 2014 4:06 pm
    "DrCaleb" said
    In making the announcement, Premier Christy Clark said the Site C Clean Energy Project will provide B.C. residents with a reliable source of power for the next 100 years for the least cost to the taxpayer.

    I hope that's the biggest lie I have to listen to today!
    BC isn't out of power. It's friggin California sucking it back, and it's the BC tax payers that foot the bill at $12+/unit, while the power suckers pay their locked in $4/unit.
    And, it isn't just the natives opposed to Site C. VERY few people in the north peace aren't opposed.
    Love the way they put the bullshit spin on this project.


    ^^ That.

    It's fine if BC wants to sell cheap power southward, so long as it's 'clean power'. But 'dirty oil', well, they'll be having none of that!
    Yep. Hypocrite bastards.
    Always the same old story.

  6. by avatar andyt
    Wed Dec 17, 2014 4:07 pm
    Your sentence can be take quite literally and make perfect sense. But, the same groups protesting your dirty oil will also be protesting our clean power. Tie it up in court for the foreseeable future. I doubt if BC could get a solar power project off the ground right now, without protesters coming out against the solar deprivation of the earthworms or something and the natives claiming infringements of their rights.

    Anyway, not sure if any new projects involving dirty bitumen (if only if were oil,) will get off the ground until the oil price goes up again.

    And calling it oil seems a stretch. You all should be exporting oil instead of bitumen.

  7. by Anonymous
    Wed Dec 17, 2014 4:22 pm
    "andyt" said
    BC boomed by building 2 dams on the Peace. Seems reasonable to expect that this dam too will Provide us with cheap energy and be good for our economy. Of course bulk buyers are going to pay a different rate than individual homes. Seems BC actually got spanked for overcharging California and had to pay 750 million to settle the suit.

    Although I've read arguments that using natural gas for power generation with much lower up front investment and probably more flexibility too.


    BOOMED? :lol:

    When did that happen. In BC they call 6% unemployment a BOOM, Alberta calls it a recession.

  8. by avatar andyt
    Wed Dec 17, 2014 4:38 pm
    Anterograde amnesia? Might explain why y'all have a 7 billion dollar hole in your budget.

  9. by avatar Alta_redneck
    Wed Dec 17, 2014 4:42 pm
    I hope BC learned from the 70's what a waste land they create when they don't harvest the trees in the proposed lake before its flooded.

  10. by avatar DrCaleb
    Wed Dec 17, 2014 4:50 pm
    "andyt" said
    You all should be exporting oil instead of bitumen.


    Once we see mineral leases to companies, it's not 'ours' anymore. It's up to the company to get it to market, not 'us'. But I agree, we should tax raw bitumen higher than oil.

    And, BTW, earthworms are an invasive species. ;)

  11. by Anonymous
    Wed Dec 17, 2014 4:59 pm
    "andyt" said
    BC boomed by building 2 dams on the Peace. Seems reasonable to expect that this dam too will Provide us with cheap energy and be good for our economy. Of course bulk buyers are going to pay a different rate than individual homes. Seems BC actually got spanked for overcharging California and had to pay 750 million to settle the suit.

    Although I've read arguments that using natural gas for power generation with much lower up front investment and probably more flexibility too.



    XD BC DEBT clock...

    “B.C.’s provincial debt will grow by a billion dollars every single quarter over the next three years – even with so-called balanced budgets,” said Jordan Bateman, the CTF’s British Columbia director. “By 2016, today’s $57 billion debt will top $69.4 billion. We need to stop this clock.”

    B.C.’s debt grows by:
    •$209 per second
    •$12,515 per minute
    •$750,913 per hour
    •$18 million per day
    •about a million dollars every 80 minutes

    http://globalnews.ca/news/674771/b-c-s- ... -province/


    It's 10 am so I'm sure Andy won't be responding till 4:24. After his shared internet comes back on.

  12. by avatar herbie
    Thu Dec 18, 2014 8:13 pm
    Fuck it. Build it.
    The issue should be why the cost has got so goddam outrageous.
    Then start looking at geothermal power for fucks sakes.

  13. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Thu Dec 18, 2014 9:19 pm
    "Alta_redneck" said
    I hope BC learned from the 70's what a waste land they create when they don't harvest the trees in the proposed lake before its flooded.


    That's silly. Who'd want all that debris clogging up the works in the new dam?

  14. by avatar Alta_redneck
    Fri Dec 19, 2014 12:38 am
    "BartSimpson" said
    I hope BC learned from the 70's what a waste land they create when they don't harvest the trees in the proposed lake before its flooded.


    That's silly. Who'd want all that debris clogging up the works in the new dam?

    It is, isn't it. try boating on them, friggin deadheads all over the place, it was good for the beachcombers. There was a log boom at the head of the lake, I bet it covered 10 acres easily. My dad would take the boat down there and walk around on the log boom catching giant Dolly Varden through the openings between the logs.

    Sugar Lake BC, I just about drowned there, the beach was just a 50M swim up shore from the camp ground. First day there i start out and all of a sudden there's grey water monsters reaching from the depths, that's what a 9 year old thinks. :lol:

    It was full grown trees still rooted into the ground in about 30 ft of water, with that stringy water moss on them. I could swim like a fish but at that moment I panicked and couldn't float no more. Looking down on a tree really messes with your head. :D



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • wildrosegirl Wed Dec 17, 2014 7:48 am
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net