![]() Bank of Canada still not committed to women on currency, petition saysPolitical | 206889 hits | Oct 12 7:41 am | Posted by: wildrosegirl Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
|
Bunch of pot stirring, sissy, morons.
....
"It's clearly discrimination against women," Forster said in an interview. "It perpetuates the myth that women are not nation builders."
Well. let's be blunt.
Women weren't nation builders. Not in the past, anyway.
Prior to 1920, they couldn't vote or be much involved in politics.
Before that, major politicians, explorers, builders, businessmen, writers... all men.
Edith Cavell was a British nurse, not Canadian.
And we already have a British woman on or money, her name is The Queen.
The real problem is that loud mouthed bitches like Forster will get traction
because the rest of us won't sit down and tell her to STFU.
44,000 out of 33 million ain't much.
....
"It's clearly discrimination against women," Forster said in an interview. "It perpetuates the myth that women are not nation builders."
Well. let's be blunt.
Women weren't nation builders. Not in the past, anyway.
Prior to 1920, they couldn't vote or be much involved in politics.
Before that, major politicians, explorers, builders, businessmen, writers... all men.
Edith Cavell was a British nurse, not Canadian.
And we already have a British woman on or money, her name is The Queen.
The real problem is that loud mouthed bitches like Forster will get traction
because the rest of us won't sit down and tell her to STFU.
44,000 out of 33 million ain't much.
I will!! Lemme at 'er!
Put womens' pics on our money, and pretty soon it will start fluctuating with times of the month. Just when you think you've got a dollar to spend, it will only be worth 75 cents real money, but when you owe money, all of a sudden it jumps to a buck and a quarter. Then it will demand that you take it out more often and go and buy shoes. But try to buy and V8 powered leaf blower, you won't hear the end of it about the waste. Finally it will say you take it for granted and just don't understand its needs and run off with some woman who knows how to treat it right, but be sure to keep sending the alimony. We've seen it all before.
I, personally, as a woman, do not give a flying f*ck who is on the bills and who is not. I spend too much time actually MAKING that money and providing for my children (spending that same money) to actually check (or more, search for) the faces on the bills.
But that is not discrimination against men?
Double standards, lady, double standards...
As an aside... The plastic bills SUCK.
I don't see what her problem is though. Isn't she already floating on the lake on the one dollar coin?
Come to think of it, who would be on these bills or coins? Celine Dion?
....
"It's clearly discrimination against women," Forster said in an interview. "It perpetuates the myth that women are not nation builders."
Well. let's be blunt.
Women weren't nation builders. Not in the past, anyway.
Prior to 1920, they couldn't vote or be much involved in politics.
Before that, major politicians, explorers, builders, businessmen, writers... all men.
Edith Cavell was a British nurse, not Canadian.
And we already have a British woman on or money, her name is The Queen.
The real problem is that loud mouthed bitches like Forster will get traction
because the rest of us won't sit down and tell her to STFU.
44,000 out of 33 million ain't much.
No, it ain't much at all. Who the f*ck gives a flying f*ck who is pictured on our money. Jeepers, it comes out of one hand and goes into another so fast who the hell has time to look at the pictures on it?
STFU about it already. Get a grip on reality you silly twat and put all that energy into something that actually matters.