Lawyer cites 'culture' to defend man charged with beating his wife to death

Cultural marxist apologists across the West should be hung in public.

Being a defence attorney is a noble profession, but Sweet Macdonald I would hate it.

Fine, then send him back to his 'culture'.

Or introduce him to our culture where it isn't.

Practice your culture in your own country.

When in someone else's, you follow theirs.

WHY is that so f***ing difficult? I have an idea.... Why not make THAT law?

Well here's hoping he gets more then 60days in jail and 2 years probation like that moron who slapped his 13yr old daughter to death. He didn't mean to kill her either.

Well it's either that or stoning.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/wor ... e18862192/

It's the same culture you might find in a petri dish.

No and he also didn't beat his daughter until she was a "bloody mess." You need better glasses, ones that don't only show the world in black and white.

Defense says he should not be charged with manslaughter because he didn't mean to kill her. Defense needs to take a course in law - that's the definition of manslaughter, killing when you didn't mean to. Prosecution says he meant to kill his wife. They also need a refresher course, because if he meant to kill her he should be charged with 2nd degree murder.

And this brings up the question of intent again, as with the case of the father slapping his daughter. Our whole system is based on it, hence we have murder charges and manslaughter charges.

He only need two slaps to kill her. So not enough slaps to turn her face into a bloody mess. Sense you are so interested on intent this man is claiming the same thing, that he did not mean to kill her. So I'm sure you will be just as satisfied with the same sentence of 60 days in jail and 2 years probation.

You might be right about the glasses, because I'm wearing yours. Using the same BS lines you used. Now you are all of a sudden against what you were for in the other thread.

Manslaughter has a sentencing range of probation to life in prison in Canada. Because it's understood that there are differing levels of culpability involved. Someone slapping their daughter twice with no foreseeable harm beyond the slap does not deserve the same sentence as somebody who beats his wife to a bloody pulp. Thank God our judges have glasses that allow more of the spectrum in than yours.

And once again you missed every point I made just to say your same old tired lines.

Signs that things really aren't going to change much in Third World shitholes

Because your points are idiotic. You draw a false equivalency between these two cases. The law can see that this is false, but you can't. YOu have no valid point.

It's horrible enough that his "culture" turns a blind eye to this sort of behavior in their own countries.

No absolution whatsoever should even be considered on this grounds.