news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

A new dawn for nuclear power?

Canadian Content
20775news upnews down

A new dawn for nuclear power?


World | 207749 hits | Oct 21 7:02 am | Posted by: saturn_656
2 Comment

Once Britain led the world in atomic energy, but decades of political dithering and irrational protests mean today's historic deal will be signed with Chinese and French firms, says Michael Hanlon

Comments

  1. by avatar martin14
    Mon Oct 21, 2013 4:59 pm
    basically a state-backed guaranteed minimum tariff for electricity ? of ?92.50 per megawatt hour.


    only to mention that price is double what Hinckley currently gets, which is around 45 pmw.


    Poor Brits, used to be the leader of everything, now can't even put a NPP
    together.

    Also, all energy companies today announced a 10% immediate price increase for consumers.
    I'll bet some pensioners will die this winter because they won't have money heat.

    Pathetic.

  2. by avatar DrCaleb
    Mon Oct 21, 2013 5:05 pm
    Worse was to come in 1986, with the Chernobyl catastrophe. Again, this said a lot more about humanity’s irrational fear of the scintillating atom than about nuclear risks. The very worst nuclear disaster in history killed fewer than 100 people directly and will probably lead to the indirect (and unmeasurable) premature deaths of a couple of thousand more, mostly from cancer.

    This was bad, but compare it to the hundreds of thousands killed by coal-fired plants, from air pollution and mining accidents, and the millions more expected to die as a result of climate change, largely brought about by burning fossil fuels. Nuclear is, of course, an almost carbon-neutral form of power generation and, wind aside (which is insanely expensive), probably the safest. Yes, there are decommissioning costs and, yes, the upfront investment is huge, but this is largely due to the fact that green concerns have set the planning bar almost unbelievably high compared to other means of generation. (This doesn’t stop campaigners trumpeting high costs as an objection.)



    Posted for truth. :)



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net