 Sex offender Michael Stanley has 'horrendous record'Law & Order | 206825 hits | Oct 05 7:25 am | Posted by: saturn_656  As the manhunt for a high-risk sex offender continued in western Saskatchewan Friday, more information emerged about Michael Sean Stanley, 48.Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 2 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
fuck the cops and the courts......someone just shoot the bastard and eventually get around to leaving an anonymous tip, in the next month or six, as to where they can find the remains. If they won't protect society, then it's up to society take back their rights.
That works for me
fuck the cops and the courts......someone just shoot the bastard and eventually get around to leaving an anonymous tip, in the next month or six, as to where they can find the remains. If they won't protect society, then it's up to society take back their rights.
That works for me
X 3
Besides, cops won't really investigate that hard into his death.
Why was he released?
'SHOOT-SHOVEL-SHUT UP'!
. If a child or anyone else is hurt, or worse, while this thing is on the loose, find out who decided to let him out and go after them too. These fucks are completely detached from reality and the consequences of their actions. Reality needs to bite them on the ass
Should be mandatory if anyone serves on this disgusting boards,
they should be held accountable for their decisions.
I thought dangerous offenders could be held indefinitely?
Why was he released?
It doesn't say that he's been so designated. If he had gone through a successful Dangerous Offender hearing he could be held indefinitely. I think we can be pretty sure that that will happen when he's caught. Why it hasn't happened already is another question the bureaucracy ought to held to account over.
I thought dangerous offenders could be held indefinitely?
Why was he released?
It doesn't say that he's been so designated. If he had gone through a successful Dangerous Offender hearing he could be held indefinitely. I think we can be pretty sure that that will happen when he's caught. Why it hasn't happened already is another question the bureaucracy ought to held to account over.
I'm sure he doesn't have the official designation of "dangerous offender" otherwise he'd still be in the can, but judging by his rap sheet and the reaction of police to reports of his presence, he should still be on the inside.
Someone screwed up.
String him up and lay him on the tracks. Can't charge the engineer for running him over.
Yeah, but that'd be messy and it might derail the train and hurt someone. I think we should build a concrete room, say 4 feet square and 8 feet tall. We put the guy in it and give him a hand grenade. Then we start filling the goddamn thing full of water. Dickhead gets a choice: pull the pin and die instantly or drown when the room fills. Either way the room drains afterwards with no mess, right and ready for the next asshole.
String him up and lay him on the tracks. Can't charge the engineer for running him over.
Yeah, but that'd be messy and it might derail the train and hurt someone. I think we should build a concrete room, say 4 feet square and 8 feet tall. We put the guy in it and give him a hand grenade. Then we start filling the goddamn thing full of water. Dickhead gets a choice: pull the pin and die instantly or drown when the room fills. Either way the room drains afterwards with no mess, right and ready for the next asshole.
I like the idea, and i bet a lot of people would. But I don't see the political will for bringing the death penalty back, particularly in such a manner.