news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

North Korea may have restarted nuclear reactor

Canadian Content
20670news upnews down

North Korea may have restarted nuclear reactor


World | 206702 hits | Sep 11 9:43 pm | Posted by: Hyack
11 Comment

A recent satellite image appears to show North Korea is restarting a plutonium reactor, in a move that could raise renewed international alarm over its nuclear weapons program, a U.S. research institute says.

Comments

  1. by avatar LightStarr
    Thu Sep 12, 2013 12:35 pm
    This is barely news down here in South Korea. I mean yea, it is important to understand what they are up to. But the South is more concerend about a politcal contender who is part of a "communist" party than this.

  2. by avatar DrCaleb
    Thu Sep 12, 2013 3:03 pm
    "LightStarr" said
    This is barely news down here in South Korea. I mean yea, it is important to understand what they are up to. But the South is more concerend about a politcal contender who is part of a "communist" party than this.


    I can only assume they are not paying attention. The reactor uses graphite (a form of carbon) to moderate the nuclear reaction. When reactors like this overheat, they burn the grahite and suddenly there is nothing to stop the reaction from becoming uncontrolled. Chernobyl was a graphite moderated design, and most countries outlaw this design for an obvious reason. *BOOM* I'm all about nuclear power, but *safe* nuclear power.

    The Kim-Juns apparently have some genetic predispostion to the crazy gene, so the South Korean might be right to not worry about all the weapons grade plutonium this plant will produce, but they might want to worry about who is actually running the show at the reactors.

  3. by avatar stratos
    Thu Sep 12, 2013 3:09 pm
    I'm thinking this might be an attempt to force people to give the the Tech for *safe* nuclear power. Not sure if they even need any type of nuclear power at this stage of their devlopement. They are not a what I would consider industeraly strong.

  4. by avatar DrCaleb
    Thu Sep 12, 2013 3:26 pm
    "stratos" said
    I'm thinking this might be an attempt to force people to give the the Tech for *safe* nuclear power. Not sure if they even need any type of nuclear power at this stage of their devlopement. They are not a what I would consider industeraly strong.


    That's kind of the same argument for not having Nuclear Power in Africa. Trouble is, you can't run heavy industry like steel foundries on solar power, and unless there is a good potential power supply these industries won't take off. You need hydro, gas or nuclear. North Korea doesn't have much natural gas, and their terrain I believe doesn't have much potential for hydro dams, so that limits their growth. That, and the nutbar at the helm.

    Nuclear power can be Uranium based, but Thorium would be better. NK chose this design, because it's also capable of processing Uranium into Plutonium and weapons grade Plutonium. Thorium can't be used for weapons in any form.

  5. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Thu Sep 12, 2013 3:27 pm
    Meanwhile Obama is more concerned about alleged chemical weapons while Lil' Kim is cooking up nooks. :roll:

  6. by avatar stratos
    Thu Sep 12, 2013 3:54 pm
    "DrCaleb" said
    I'm thinking this might be an attempt to force people to give the the Tech for *safe* nuclear power. Not sure if they even need any type of nuclear power at this stage of their devlopement. They are not a what I would consider industeraly strong.


    That's kind of the same argument for not having Nuclear Power in Africa. Trouble is, you can't run heavy industry like steel foundries on solar power, and unless there is a good potential power supply these industries won't take off. You need hydro, gas or nuclear. North Korea doesn't have much natural gas, and their terrain I believe doesn't have much potential for hydro dams, so that limits their growth. That, and the nutbar at the helm.

    Nuclear power can be Uranium based, but Thorium would be better. NK chose this design, because it's also capable of processing Uranium into Plutonium and weapons grade Plutonium. Thorium can't be used for weapons in any form.

    Freaking mind reader you answered my next question before I could ask. Thanks

  7. by avatar DrCaleb
    Thu Sep 12, 2013 4:02 pm
    I'm here to serve. ;)

  8. by avatar stratos
    Thu Sep 12, 2013 4:04 pm
    Well make me a samwich then :D

  9. by avatar DrCaleb
    Thu Sep 12, 2013 4:05 pm
    Union rules say that's Brenda's job.

  10. by avatar stratos
    Thu Sep 12, 2013 4:08 pm
    ROTFL

  11. by avatar Jabberwalker
    Thu Sep 12, 2013 10:22 pm

    The Kim-Juns apparently have some genetic predispostion to the crazy gene, so the South Korean might be right to not worry about all the weapons grade plutonium this plant will produce, but they might want to worry about who is actually running the show at the reactors.



    They're letting Dennis Rodman have a crack at the controls ... like those drunks who blew up the Chernobyl reactor in Belarus.



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net