 Animal killer Kayla Bourque appeals pet banLaw & Order | 206774 hits | Sep 11 9:40 pm | Posted by: Hyack  A B.C. woman who was convicted of torturing and killing animals and who admitted to wanting to kill homeless people is hoping to change her release conditions barring her from owning pets.Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 2 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
And someone is seriously thinking of letting her have a pet?
So far it's only her lawyer trying to get the restriction changed......
"We want her to be involved in mental health. We want her to be involved in lots of other things so that she can hopefully not end up with any problems in her future."
....."not end up with problems in her future".....from what I've read about this woman she already has enough problems to keep a half dozen people in therapy for the next 10-20 years. Why burden her more with having a live....hopefully...animal or animals to care for and worry about? Of course, knowing the Canadian judicial system, they will probably consider the restrictions too harsh and allow her to get her hands on another "pet" so she can once again cause unnecessary pain, suffering or injury to them.....
It is not a matter of rehabilitation. She sounds like a sociopath. There is no cure for psychopathy. She will not "advance" or "show progress" as her lawyer puts it. She will hurt animals again if given the opportunity. She has no choice in the matter. She is probably just doing this for attention, something scoiopaths often crave.
Maybe she should apply for a job in this year's seal hunt to redeem herself.
Maybe she should apply for a job in this year's seal hunt to redeem herself.
The problem is that she doesn't want to see animals die, she wants to see them suffer. She's hooked up wrong.
The problem is that she doesn't want to see animals die, she wants to see them suffer. She's hooked up wrong.
Ah, excuse me. If she wants to make animals suffer then she needs a job at the Inland Revenue.
You thought she was a sweet little child, turns out to be a murderous raving lunatic.
Lifetime ban is an 'appropriate limitation'. Want a pet? too fucking bad.
if she wants to play with something give her some razor blades
Then give her a pet Hyena.