Japan on Tuesday unveiled its biggest warship since World War II, a huge flat-top destroyer that has raised eyebrows in China and elsewhere because it bears a strong resemblance to a conventional aircraft carrier.
Yea, an aircraft carrier without aircraft launchers. Could it be for unmanned drones?
What exactly makes this a 'destroyer'? To me, that word means low in the water, fast and armed to the teeth. Seems like this ship in only one of those.
Oh, I know The box that is came in says: Contents: One (1) Destroyer.
I remember talking to an old WWII Corvette veteran when the Halifax class first came out. He was angry and indignant that all the Canadian government would supply to the navy were merely Frigates. They sure aren't what he thought a Frigate should be. In his world, these would be classified as light cruisers. Anyway, the definitions of warship types have become nonsense with the various revolutions in weaponry that they carry. The classifications are downright silly, sometimes.
Anyway, I'm glad to see Japan take their defences seriously again ... and on our side, again.
Shoulda put a giant gold chrysanthemum emblem on the prow and named it the Yamato. Create some nervousness among the Americans as much as it would the Chinese.
"Freakinoldguy" said After looking at the bow of that "Destroyer", I'd hate to be living in one mess in a heavy sea. It'd be like hitting a brick wall with every wave.
I guess that it a way to squeeze more foredeck space out of narrow hull. You'd think that they would make it tsunami proof.
I guess that calling it a "destroyer" is a little like Japan calling the empire that they won by military invasion the "Co-Prosperity Sphere". The name changes the reality of it.
Pretty strange looking destroyer.
Even Japan has a faster procurement system than us and they're in incredible debt.
Pretty strange looking destroyer.
Yea, an aircraft carrier without aircraft launchers. Could it be for unmanned drones?
What exactly makes this a 'destroyer'? To me, that word means low in the water, fast and armed to the teeth. Seems like this ship in only one of those.
How is that "technically a destroyer"?
Oh, I know The box that is came in says: Contents: One (1) Destroyer.
I remember talking to an old WWII Corvette veteran when the Halifax class first came out. He was angry and indignant that all the Canadian government would supply to the navy were merely Frigates. They sure aren't what he thought a Frigate should be. In his world, these would be classified as light cruisers. Anyway, the definitions of warship types have become nonsense with the various revolutions in weaponry that they carry. The classifications are downright silly, sometimes.
Anyway, I'm glad to see Japan take their defences seriously again ... and on our side, again.
After looking at the bow of that "Destroyer",
I guess that it a way to squeeze more foredeck space out of narrow hull. You'd think that they would make it tsunami proof.
Expectation:
Reality