news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Deal opens door for Saskatchewan uranium to go

Canadian Content
20685news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Deal opens door for Saskatchewan uranium to go to India


Business | 206846 hits | Apr 08 3:37 pm | Posted by: Robair
21 Comment

The nuclear regulators in India and Canada signed off on a deal that clears a path for Canadian uranium to be sold in one of the world's largest markets.

Comments

  1. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Wed Apr 10, 2013 8:59 am
    My guess would be that India is just a stopover for the uranium on it's way to it's real destination.

    Islamabad Pakistan. :D

  2. by avatar CanadianJeff
    Wed Apr 10, 2013 11:03 am
    I'm not quite sure how this all works out but I suspect that there are safeguards to ensure the stuff never sees Pakistan. :P

  3. by avatar bootlegga
    Wed Apr 10, 2013 12:13 pm
    Why not, we sold them reactors and gave them nuke capability in the first place, why not make some more money off of them...

    /sarcasm off

    Personally, I don't like the idea of selling nuclear material to a nation that will almost certainly use it for weapons.

  4. by avatar bootlegga
    Wed Apr 10, 2013 12:13 pm
    "Freakinoldguy" said
    My guess would be that India is just a stopover for the uranium on it's way to it's real destination.

    Islamabad Pakistan. :D


    I doubt India is ever going to allow any company or nation to transport fissionable material through its borders to its biggest enemy.

  5. by GeeGeeMcFee
    Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:19 pm
    "Freakinoldguy" said
    My guess would be that India is just a stopover for the uranium on it's way to it's real destination.

    Islamabad Pakistan. :D


    You mean about 550 meters above Islamabad? Just like this:


  6. by avatar ShepherdsDog
    Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:51 pm
    "bootlegga" said
    My guess would be that India is just a stopover for the uranium on it's way to it's real destination.

    Islamabad Pakistan. :D


    I doubt India is ever going to allow any company or nation to transport fissionable material through its borders to its biggest enemy.

    Don't think the verb he alluded to was transporting....more like dropping, launching or detonating

  7. by avatar commanderkai
    Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:59 pm
    "bootlegga" said
    Why not, we sold them reactors and gave them nuke capability in the first place, why not make some more money off of them...

    /sarcasm off

    Personally, I don't like the idea of selling nuclear material to a nation that will almost certainly use it for weapons.


    Would they use it for weapons, though? They have a pretty significant stockpile of nuclear weapons already. That being said, I have absolutely no idea how large India's civilian nuclear power infrastructure is.

  8. by avatar bootlegga
    Wed Apr 10, 2013 4:41 pm
    "ShepherdsDog" said
    My guess would be that India is just a stopover for the uranium on it's way to it's real destination.

    Islamabad Pakistan. :D


    I doubt India is ever going to allow any company or nation to transport fissionable material through its borders to its biggest enemy.

    Don't think the verb he alluded to was transporting....more like dropping, launching or detonating



    :lol:

    That's why I try to use emoticons to convey meaning - sometimes it's hard to tell context online.

  9. by avatar bootlegga
    Wed Apr 10, 2013 4:43 pm
    "commanderkai" said
    Why not, we sold them reactors and gave them nuke capability in the first place, why not make some more money off of them...

    /sarcasm off

    Personally, I don't like the idea of selling nuclear material to a nation that will almost certainly use it for weapons.


    Would they use it for weapons, though? They have a pretty significant stockpile of nuclear weapons already. That being said, I have absolutely no idea how large India's civilian nuclear power infrastructure is.

    I guess it's possible they might use it for civilian purposes, but given that India and Pakistan are basically in an arms race, I don't see any good reason to toss gasoline on that fire.

  10. by avatar DrCaleb
    Wed Apr 10, 2013 5:03 pm
    "bootlegga" said

    Personally, I don't like the idea of selling nuclear material to a nation that will almost certainly use it for weapons.


    The material we sell them isn't suitable for weapons, only for power. The advantage of CANDU design is it can use 'poor' quality uranium for power.

    India used the CIRUS reactors we sold them to extract plutonium for their weapons (suspected, anyhow) and possibly tritium from the CANDU reactor for a hydrogen bomb. But the plutonium didn't come from us, or the CANDU reactors.

  11. by avatar Robair
    Wed Apr 10, 2013 5:11 pm
    Yea, what the Dr. said.

    The rest of you guys just want to keep Saskatchewan down.

  12. by jeff744
    Wed Apr 10, 2013 5:21 pm
    "bootlegga" said
    Why not, we sold them reactors and gave them nuke capability in the first place, why not make some more money off of them...

    /sarcasm off

    Personally, I don't like the idea of selling nuclear material to a nation that will almost certainly use it for weapons.

    We sold it to America for weapons use.

  13. by Canadian_Mind
    Wed Apr 10, 2013 6:41 pm
    "bootlegga" said

    I guess it's possible they might use it for civilian purposes, but given that India and Pakistan are basically in an arms race, I don't see any good reason to toss gasoline on that fire.


    Why not? We should be doing everything we can to cozy up with India and establish a mutually benificial relationship. Ignoring the fact that Pakistan is no true friend of ours (so no tears over the arms race here), it maintains a balance of power. We can't put all our eggs in one basket, be it the USA or China. I have no trust for China, and befriending a country who could have our back if China goes loko, or vic-versa, isn't such a bad idea. In 20 years the reality will that if the world goes to hell, the only country who could muscle China around without resorting to nukes is India.

  14. by avatar bootlegga
    Wed Apr 10, 2013 7:05 pm
    "jeff744" said
    Why not, we sold them reactors and gave them nuke capability in the first place, why not make some more money off of them...

    /sarcasm off

    Personally, I don't like the idea of selling nuclear material to a nation that will almost certainly use it for weapons.


    We sold it to America for weapons use.

    It's one thing to sell uranium to your closest ally in the fight against Hitler and then Stalin, it's a whole other ballgame when you start interfering in a dispute on the other side of the world in which you really have no vested interest.

    However, as DrC noted, apparently what we would sell isn't capable of being turned into weapons, so I say go for it. We can use all the diversification in our foreign trade we can get.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2026 by Canadaka.net