news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Canada blocks $5.2 billion Petronas bid for Pro

Canadian Content
20716news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Canada blocks $5.2 billion Petronas bid for Progress Energy


Business | 207157 hits | Oct 20 9:09 am | Posted by: saturn_656
6 Comment

TORONTO/KUALA LUMPUR (Reuters) - Canada has blocked Malaysian state oil firm Petronas' C$5.17 billion ($5.2 billion) bid for gas producer Progress Energy Resources in a surprise move that could signal

Comments

  1. by avatar saturn_656
    Sun Oct 21, 2012 3:29 am
    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-in ... le4626206/


    Malaysia?s Petronas refused a last-minute request by the federal government for more time to consider the state-owned energy producer?s proposed $6-billion acquisition of Canada?s Progress Energy Resources, forcing Ottawa to block the deal just minutes before a deadline elapsed midnight Friday.


    Petronas is taking their ball and going home.

  2. by avatar CanadianJeff
    Sun Oct 21, 2012 12:09 pm
    Honestly I don't get why we buy our oil from overseas. We should just process it here and tell the clowns who want to point at emissions numbers all day that at least we have the balls not to hide the numbers overseas by having other countries process our oil for us.

    For me Canada selling it's oil and gas to overseas competitors makes no sense until we can maintain energy independence ourselves. Especially considering how many jobs it could create here at home.

  3. by avatar Gunnair  Gold Member
    Sun Oct 21, 2012 2:35 pm
    "CanadianJeff" said
    Honestly I don't get why we buy our oil from overseas. We should just process it here and tell the clowns who want to point at emissions numbers all day that at least we have the balls not to hide the numbers overseas by having other countries process our oil for us.

    For me Canada selling it's oil and gas to overseas competitors makes no sense until we can maintain energy independence ourselves. Especially considering how many jobs it could create here at home.


    Who here is locally going to sink in the billions to process it?

  4. by avatar andyt
    Sun Oct 21, 2012 4:42 pm
    "CanadianJeff" said
    Honestly I don't get why we buy our oil from overseas. We should just process it here and tell the clowns who want to point at emissions numbers all day that at least we have the balls not to hide the numbers overseas by having other countries process our oil for us.

    For me Canada selling it's oil and gas to overseas competitors makes no sense until we can maintain energy independence ourselves. Especially considering how many jobs it could create here at home.


    Agreed, that seems like the best case. Send the oil east instead of them buying it from overseas. And what's the greenhouse cost of shipping oil in tankers? Since this would take massive investment, I could see the federal govt getting involved financially here, as long as the economics make sense. (It just may be true that it's cheaper to buy that foreign oil).

  5. by avatar redhatmamma
    Mon Oct 22, 2012 12:05 am
    Harper is damned if he does and damned if he doesn't, people were screaming about a Chinese takeover, now Mulcair is screaming he doesn't like it... :(

    It's been suggested that a refinery be built in Kitimat

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/commenta ... le4487586/

  6. by avatar andyt
    Mon Oct 22, 2012 12:27 am
    Yes, by David Black. He's certainly not putting up his money to do so, not that he has enough. People have pointed out that sending tankers full of gasoline thru the coast might lead to less long term damage in case of an accident, but would be very exciting in the short term.



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2026 by Canadaka.net