news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Ford, GM co-design transmissions

Canadian Content
20702news upnews down

Ford, GM co-design transmissions


Business | 207006 hits | Oct 01 2:17 pm | Posted by: DrCaleb
59 Comment

DETROIT -- General Motors and Ford Motor Co. are jointly designing nine- and 10-speed automatic transmissions for broad use across their vehicle lineups in a bid to boost fuel economy. GM is leading the design of a nine-speed gearbox for use in front-

Comments

  1. by avatar Robair
    Mon Oct 01, 2012 11:17 pm
    The Myans were right!


    8O

  2. by avatar SprCForr  Gold Member
    Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:01 am
    Boneheads. Take an Allision trans and bolt it to a Cummins.

    Give us the option to have a Lenco.

  3. by avatar CDN_PATRIOT
    Tue Oct 02, 2012 2:02 am
    Instead of helping GM, Ford should be crushing them.

    -J.

  4. by Lemmy
    Tue Oct 02, 2012 2:07 am
    Not surprising when you consider that automobile manufactures have been colluding with one another to fuck over consumers for generations.

  5. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Tue Oct 02, 2012 5:00 am
    This is just the first step towards the universal platform they were talking about a few years back.

    Next comes the super plants.

  6. by OnTheIce
    Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:11 pm
    Manufacturers have been co-designing vehicles and parts for quite a long time. This isn't really anything new.

    "Lemmy" said
    Not surprising when you consider that automobile manufactures have been colluding with one another to fuck over consumers for generations.


    How so?

  7. by Lemmy
    Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:59 pm
    "OnTheIce" said
    How so?

    Price fixing, engineered break-down, reluctance to adopt safety features, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc.

  8. by avatar saturn_656
    Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:11 pm
    As long as they don't involve Chrysler, I'm cool with this. :)

  9. by OnTheIce
    Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:17 pm
    "Lemmy" said
    How so?

    Price fixing, engineered break-down, reluctance to adopt safety features, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc.

    You're entitled to your .

  10. by avatar Robair
    Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:21 pm
    "OnTheIce" said
    How so?

    Price fixing, engineered break-down, reluctance to adopt safety features, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc.

    You're entitled to your
    He sort of has a point. A car is engineered to last 7 years.

    But Lemmy's a bit jaded, he's bought some lemons. :lol:

  11. by avatar Public_Domain
    Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:26 pm
    :|

  12. by OnTheIce
    Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:29 pm
    "Robair" said

    He sort of has a point. A car is engineered to last 7 years.

    But Lemmy's a bit jaded, he's bought some lemons. :lol:


    That's a common myth, but there's no truth to that whatsoever.

  13. by Lemmy
    Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:44 pm
    "OnTheIce" said
    You're entitled to your .

    It's not an opinion. It's fact.

    "Robair" said
    But Lemmy's a bit jaded, he's bought some lemons.

    '78 Dodge Omni. 8O

  14. by avatar Robair
    Wed Oct 03, 2012 3:05 pm
    "OnTheIce" said

    He sort of has a point. A car is engineered to last 7 years.

    But Lemmy's a bit jaded, he's bought some lemons. :lol:


    That's a common myth, but there's no truth to that whatsoever.

    I've never worked in the automotive industry, buy I know that it IS how it's done with municipal equipment (street sweepers, garbage trucks etc).

    The machines used to be built too good. Take a Vac-All, there's towns still using a 30 year old machine (because they were built too heavy and don't wear out) and if you try to sell them a new one, no way they'll consider that brand again. Because the one they've got is so hard to work with. Well, yea... it's 30 years old.

    Companys in that idustry have smartened up, and now the machines don't contain so much steel. You want them to be not worth fixing in a decade or so. otherwise they won't be buying another one. Just keep replacing bushings in the one they've got...

    Now I work in forestry equipment. You don't have to worry about that stuff lasting too long! Just build as strong as the budget allows.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2 3 4

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • Robair Mon Oct 01, 2012 3:17 pm
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2026 by Canadaka.net