news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Avro Arrow redesign pitched as alternative to F

Canadian Content
20823news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Avro Arrow redesign pitched as alternative to F-35 fighter jets


Military | 208230 hits | Sep 09 9:39 pm | Posted by: Canadaka
55 Comment

An update to the storied CF-105 Avro Arrow was put forward as an alternative to the purchase of F-35 stealth fighter jets

Comments

  1. by avatar Canadaka
    Mon Sep 10, 2012 4:42 am
    video on global http://www.globalnews.ca/feds+reject+bi ... story.html

    novel idea but im fairly certain it wouldnt work well for the needs the air force has now. it was a long range intercept for another era. the F35 is crap though, there are better planes sutied for Canada's needs.

    Maybe the Liberals should pick this up as an issue, they are always saying they are about 'Big, Bold ideas'.

  2. by avatar BeaverFever
    Mon Sep 10, 2012 4:50 am
    Sounds pretty far-fetched, I have to say. How about a Canadian moon base and aircraft carrier while we're at it?

  3. by jeff744
    Mon Sep 10, 2012 5:16 am
    One of my friends suggested upgrading the CF-18 design and buying another batch instead. On the note of the Arrow, it could likely be done but the problem would be cost of development and then production, we would need a few places with guaranteed orders to actually even consider it.

  4. by avatar BeaverFever
    Mon Sep 10, 2012 5:19 am
    That would still require a bigger order than just Canada's.

  5. by jeff744
    Mon Sep 10, 2012 5:21 am
    "BeaverFever" said
    That would still require a bigger order than just Canada's.

    Hence why we would need guaranteed orders, likely pitched to someone like Russia that has a lot of area to cover but only so much cash to do it with.

  6. by avatar BeaverFever
    Mon Sep 10, 2012 5:31 am
    Russia would never buy foreign A/C. They make and use their own. Turkey maybe...

  7. by jeff744
    Mon Sep 10, 2012 5:45 am
    "BeaverFever" said
    Russia would never buy foreign A/C. They make and use their own. Turkey maybe...

    Even then, we would be lucky, the Arrow is designed for a long gone era, it would take a massive amount of cash to bring that thing to any chance of being able to work out.

  8. by avatar herbie
    Mon Sep 10, 2012 6:03 am
    A long gone era when Canadians thought they were good enough to build aircraft, rockets, atomic reactors, hydrofoils, etc.
    Now stop daydreaming and ship us that raw bitumen, coal, raw logs and water, boy.

  9. by avatar sandorski
    Mon Sep 10, 2012 6:22 am
    A most intriguing idea.

  10. by jeff744
    Mon Sep 10, 2012 6:36 am
    "herbie" said
    A long gone era when Canadians thought they were good enough to build aircraft, rockets, atomic reactors, hydrofoils, etc.
    Now stop daydreaming and ship us that raw bitumen, coal, raw logs and water, boy.

    We were good enough to do a lot of it and still are, the problem is that a lot of the drive to actually do it is gone.

  11. by avatar BeaverFever
    Mon Sep 10, 2012 6:45 am
    The end-to-end cost just for the sake of having a uniquely Canadian-made product would be 100x more than buying one off-the-shelf. And considering that modern aircraft manufacturing involves dozens of multinational corporations from around the world anyway makes the Canadian-ness of the finished product questionable anyway.

  12. by avatar bootlegga
    Mon Sep 10, 2012 3:01 pm
    There nothing stopping Canada from making its own plane - except cost. If Canadian taxpayers are willing to sink $20-30 billion to do so, then let's do it. The problem isn't know-how - it's money. People are upset that the F-35 will cost us as much as $25 billion - which is at least what a brand-new designed from the ground up plane like this would cost us.


    "herbie" said
    A long gone era when Canadians thought they were good enough to build aircraft, rockets, atomic reactors, hydrofoils, etc.
    Now stop daydreaming and ship us that raw bitumen, coal, raw logs and water, boy.


    It'd be funny if it wasn't true... :(

  13. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Mon Sep 10, 2012 3:13 pm
    While a rehash of a half-century old design is economically DOA the idea that Canada could produce a competitive fighter is not entirely off base. So long as it is accepted that there will be high development costs going into the effort to build not just a fighter, but the aerospace infrastructure necessary to build it, then in the long run this would be awesome for Canada. Likewise, I firmly support Canada developing a ship building capability again so Canada is not dependent upon other nations for critical defense needs.

  14. by avatar RUEZ
    Mon Sep 10, 2012 3:39 pm
    "herbie" said
    A long gone era when Canadians thought they were good enough to build aircraft, rockets, atomic reactors, hydrofoils, etc.
    Now stop daydreaming and ship us that raw bitumen, coal, raw logs and water, boy.

    There's nothing wrong with using your natural resources to compliment the other industries in your country. You'd be out of business if it weren't for natural resources.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2 3 4

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net