news Canadian News
Good Evening Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

RCMP tells plane carrying anti-Harper banner ov

Canadian Content
20713news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

RCMP tells plane carrying anti-Harper banner over Parliament Hill to land


Strange | 207130 hits | Sep 04 6:04 am | Posted by: Regina
23 Comment

Union accuses Mounties of using political reasons in decision

Comments

  1. by OnTheIce
    Tue Sep 04, 2012 1:14 pm
    Another union, hard at "work".

  2. by Regina  Gold Member
    Tue Sep 04, 2012 2:02 pm
    Next smart idea will have the teacher scratching their nails on chalkboards at Queen's Park. :lol:

  3. by Anonymous
    Tue Sep 04, 2012 7:03 pm
    So why was he forced to land?

    http://www.leaderpost.com/news/Union+ac ... story.html
    It remains unclear why the plane was ordered out of the sky as the Ciambella and the RCMP offered conflicting stories.

    Ciambella says he repeatedly checked with air traffic control to ensure that he was outside Ottawa’s restricted zones, and that at no time was he told that he had penetrated the restricted area above Parliament Hill.
    ...
    RCMP spokeswoman Cpl. Lucy Shorey said officers on the ground spotted the plane and felt it was flying within restricted airspace over Parliament Hill
    ...
    When the story first broke Monday, the RCMP directed all media inquiries to Nav Canada, the private company that provides air traffic control services in Canada.

    But it confirmed the plane never breached a restricted fly zone in Ottawa and said its air traffic controllers never instructed the plane to land.

    “We did not communicate that to the pilot,” said Nav Canada spokesman Ron Singer.

  4. by avatar 2Cdo
    Tue Sep 04, 2012 7:04 pm
    Another good use of union dues. :roll:

  5. by avatar Wada
    Tue Sep 04, 2012 7:14 pm
    Even better is the taxpayers cost to have this plane brought down. XD

  6. by OnTheIce
    Tue Sep 04, 2012 7:17 pm
    "Wada" said
    Even better is the taxpayers cost to have this plane brought down. XD


    I doubt they brought in a special air traffic controller to radio to the plane. Me thinks they already have those working 24/7 in Ottawa. :lol:

  7. by avatar Wada
    Tue Sep 04, 2012 7:23 pm
    Who pays the RCMP? Big oil?

  8. by OnTheIce
    Tue Sep 04, 2012 7:26 pm
    "Wada" said
    Who pays the RCMP? Big oil?


    You're making it out that there was a specific expense incurred due to this decision.

    What's a phone call worth? :lol:

  9. by avatar Wada
    Tue Sep 04, 2012 7:31 pm
    They were wasting valuale time that they could have been spent arresting dope dealers and such instead of harrassing a legitimate business owner. :)

  10. by avatar fifeboy
    Tue Sep 04, 2012 7:39 pm
    "2Cdo" said
    Another good use of union dues. :roll:

    And who determines if it is good use of union dues? You? The Union members? Who?

  11. by Thanos
    Tue Sep 04, 2012 7:48 pm
    Hitler.

  12. by avatar fifeboy
    Tue Sep 04, 2012 7:55 pm
    "Thanos" said
    Hitler.
    OK then, what's yer dad say? :wink:

  13. by avatar EyeBrock
    Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:32 pm
    Freedom of Speech is a charter right. Let them fly a banner with a political message. As long as they stick to the rules of the airways and obey air traffic, what's the problem? In this case they flew into restricted airspace. Naughty and dangerous.

  14. by Anonymous
    Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:37 pm
    "EyeBrock" said
    Freedom of Speech is a charter right. Let them fly a banner with a political message. As long as they stick to the rules of the airways and obey air traffic, what's the problem? In this case they flew into restricted airspace. Naughty and dangerous.


    The article says he did fly in restricted airspace.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net