![]() Dead man eaten by bear identified as convicted killer | CTV NewsLaw & Order | 207049 hits | Jun 02 7:39 am | Posted by: Guy_Fawkes Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
|
Why? the guy who the bear ate was charged for killing someone who had been accused of raping a family member.
And found not guilty by the court.
Parole documents show the murder victim was charged with sexual assault, but was found not guilty shortly before he was killed.
Why? the guy who the bear ate was charged for killing someone who had been accused of raping a family member.
And found not guilty by the court.
Parole documents show the murder victim was charged with sexual assault, but was found not guilty shortly before he was killed.
True enough though why was he found not guilty? Because he didn't do it or because of a technicality?
Why? the guy who the bear ate was charged for killing someone who had been accused of raping a family member.
And found not guilty by the court.
Parole documents show the murder victim was charged with sexual assault, but was found not guilty shortly before he was killed.
True enough though why was he found not guilty? Because he didn't do it or because of a technicality?
From what I can find, Kohlman was cleared of allegations of sexual assault.
This is the most "useful" I can find:
http://www.kamloopsthisweek.com/news/156523425.html
Basically, it does not say anywhere why he was found not guilty. It does say that Wagner was not one of the friendliest people on earth...