The Large Hadron Collider is operating again after its winter break, and running at even higher energies as it seeks new physics and a resolution to the hunt for the Higgs boson.
I tried to find an answer, gonavy, but no luck. Perhaps someone knows a source.
This is a paper on the evolution of accelerators that covers quite a lot of the energy requirements but, on skimming it, I don't see it in a form that satisfies your question.
"Gunnair" said What? No comments from the scientific community?
What's your issue with this? Are getting all Suzuki-hater here by saying the advance of science should be energy free otherwise it's hypocritical?
Hell, I'd support them taking all the energy you use to post to support a partical accelerator. That's ok, I've been saving my farts in a jar to donate to their project.
"gonavy47" said What? No comments from the scientific community?
What's your issue with this? Are getting all Suzuki-hater here by saying the advance of science should be energy free otherwise it's hypocritical?
Hell, I'd support them taking all the energy you use to post to support a partical accelerator. That's ok, I've been saving my farts in a jar to donate to their project.
Probably the most useful exhaust coming out of your many orifices.
Even if I had an opinion on Global Warming, I wouldn't give a shit because this thing has the potential to leap us forward in our understanding of so much. Frankly, that's worth it.
This is a paper on the evolution of accelerators that covers quite a lot of the energy requirements but, on skimming it, I don't see it in a form that satisfies your question.
Nevertheless, it may be interesting.
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/pubs/beaml ... wanted=all
I wonder what it's impact is on global warming. Seems to take a lot of electricity to run it.
Better to use electricity for this purpose than all the electronic toys people seem to need.
What? No comments from the scientific community?
What's your issue with this? Are getting all Suzuki-hater here by saying the advance of science should be energy free otherwise it's hypocritical?
Hell, I'd support them taking all the energy you use to post to support a partical accelerator.
I wonder what it's impact is on global warming. Seems to take a lot of electricity to run it.
Geneva the city has 200,000 people.
LHC draws twice that, that's a city of 400,000..... Kitchener, ON
Powered by EDF.
French.
Nuclear.
Discounted price, so everyone pays.
http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/embe ... n-collider
What? No comments from the scientific community?
What's your issue with this? Are getting all Suzuki-hater here by saying the advance of science should be energy free otherwise it's hypocritical?
Hell, I'd support them taking all the energy you use to post to support a partical accelerator.
That's ok, I've been saving my farts in a jar to donate to their project.
Yup. Hypocritical as hell. But hey, nobody's perfect, even scientists.
I don't have your advanced reasoning skills. Please explain, in simple terms, how this is hypocrisy?
What? No comments from the scientific community?
What's your issue with this? Are getting all Suzuki-hater here by saying the advance of science should be energy free otherwise it's hypocritical?
Hell, I'd support them taking all the energy you use to post to support a partical accelerator.
That's ok, I've been saving my farts in a jar to donate to their project.
Probably the most useful exhaust coming out of your many orifices.