news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

F-35 cost 200 Million each

Canadian Content
20715news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

F-35 cost 200 Million each


Military | 207152 hits | Mar 15 10:48 pm | Posted by: Scape
68 Comment

American military top-brass met with foreign officials overseas this week after growing problems with the US Air Force’s F-35 program has caused a handful of nations to consider terminating their contracts with the States to purchase warplanes.

Comments

  1. by avatar gonavy47
    Fri Mar 16, 2012 3:41 pm
    Let's get out of this and go for what we really need, two engined jets.

  2. by Bruce_E_T
    Fri Mar 16, 2012 3:53 pm
    "gonavy47" said
    Let's get out of this and go for what we really need, two engined jets.


    :D Not really, I think.

    Ongoing incidents onboard the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter jets have caused the US Air Force to suspend the program themselves several times as of late, and with other countries lined up to purchase the planes at roughly $200 million a pop, malfunctions, delays and growing costs are raising more than just a few eyebrows.


    But if they are balking on it what is every one supposed to think. There is a lot of money involved here. You could get stuck with a $200M per unit purchase price and then a lot of expensive problems after that. :cry:

  3. by avatar gonavy47
    Fri Mar 16, 2012 4:00 pm
    Ask any fighter jock, and they'll tell you, two engines are better than one. Especially flying the distances over uninhabited areas that our boys and girls do.

  4. by avatar PublicAnimalNo9
    Fri Mar 16, 2012 4:03 pm
    Yep, I doubt you'll find too many(if any) RCAF pilots that would take a single over a dual powerplant

  5. by Canadian_Mind
    Fri Mar 16, 2012 4:16 pm
    200 million? That's more than the cost of the Raptor. 8O

  6. by Bruce_E_T
    Fri Mar 16, 2012 4:19 pm
    "PublicAnimalNo9" said
    Yep, I doubt you'll find too many(if any) RCAF pilots that would take a single over a dual powerplant


    Sorry. I thought he was refering to older planes rather than new material. :oops:

  7. by avatar andyt
    Fri Mar 16, 2012 4:21 pm
    Weren't there a lot of experts on this forum assuring is that the cost wouldn't exceed 100 million per (don't remember the exact figure) We had some very strong opinions about how the F-35 was the only option and they pity the fool who believes otherwise.

  8. by avatar dino_bobba_renno
    Fri Mar 16, 2012 4:25 pm
    "Canadian_Mind" said
    200 million? That's more than the cost of the Raptor. 8O

    We should just buy the damn Raptors then, at least they have two engines.

  9. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Fri Mar 16, 2012 4:48 pm
    "andyt" said
    Weren't there a lot of experts on this forum assuring is that the cost wouldn't exceed 100 million per (don't remember the exact figure) We had some very strong opinions about how the F-35 was the only option and they pity the fool who believes otherwise.


    Not me. To me the F-35 is a pimple on a wart.

  10. by avatar andyt
    Fri Mar 16, 2012 4:49 pm
    No Bart, it's not always about you. It was some of our Canadian military experts.

  11. by Canadian_Mind
    Fri Mar 16, 2012 4:51 pm
    "dino_bobba_renno" said
    200 million? That's more than the cost of the Raptor. 8O

    We should just buy the damn Raptors then, at least they have two engines.

    Don't think we're allowed. Although that would be a lovely turn of events.

  12. by avatar PublicAnimalNo9
    Fri Mar 16, 2012 4:57 pm
    "dino_bobba_renno" said
    200 million? That's more than the cost of the Raptor. 8O

    We should just buy the damn Raptors then, at least they have two engines.
    It'll never happen. The US has zero desire to import that technology to anyone.

  13. by avatar bootlegga
    Fri Mar 16, 2012 5:40 pm
    "andyt" said
    Weren't there a lot of experts on this forum assuring is that the cost wouldn't exceed 100 million per (don't remember the exact figure) We had some very strong opinions about how the F-35 was the only option and they pity the fool who believes otherwise.


    Now, now Andy, you know how it is around elections - anyone who calls BS on Harper and Co. is called a left wing partisan, even if a year later the promise Harper made falls flat (just like his 2008 election promise there wouldn't be a recession)! :wink: :lol:

  14. by avatar Shadow_Flanker
    Fri Mar 16, 2012 5:41 pm
    200 million per F-35A?

    We can get a pair of Dassault Rafales for that price. Plus other benefits.

    I now I have said this before on a other recent topic, so sorry if I sound like a record. Dump the JSF and hold our own MMRCA competition.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2 3 4 5

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net